18 November 2009

Processo Madeleine McCann: Informação de Serviço 03.09.2007

Esta informação de serviço foi submetida pelo Inspector Ricardo Paiva, oficial de ligação da PJ junto do casal McCann, em 3 de Setembro de 2007 - quatro dias antes de Kate Healy e Gerry McCann terem sido constituídos arguidos.





NUIPC: 201/07.0 GALGS
Data: 2007/09/03


INFORMAÇÃO DE SERVIÇO

Para: Coordenador de Investigação Criminal, Lic. Gonçalo Amaral

De: Ricardo Paiva, Inspector

Assunto: desaparecimento de Madeleine McCann


No decurso da investigação a correr termos no âmbito do Inquérito identificado em epígrafe, foram pelo signatário efectuados diversos contactos pessoais com o casal KATE e GERALD MCCANN, decorrentes da tarefa que me está incumbida de servir de elemento de comunicação entre a Polícia e o casal McCann.

Neste contexto, assistiu o signatário a diversos comportamentos “estranhos” por parte do casal que gradualmente foi reagindo de forma muito negativa à crescente actividade investigatória levada a cabo por esta Polícia, em especial quando, decorrente da utilização dos meios cinotécnicos ingleses de detecção de odor de cadáveres, surgiu com mais evidência na investigação a hipótese de ter ocorrido a morte de MADELEINE MCCANN.

Por diversas vezes foi dito pelo casal MCCANN que as atenções da Polícia se deveriam manter direccionadas na hipótese de rapto, que na opinião do casal foi o único cenário que ocorreu e que a Polícia não se devia esquecer de continuar a investigar o suspeito ROBERT MURAT.

Estranhamente, foi também exigido por diversas vezes por KATE MCCANN, já passados mais de 3 meses após o desaparecimento de MADELEINE, que a Polícia procedesse a análises ao sangue, cabelos e unhas dos irmãos gémeos de MADELEINE, pois segundo disse, tinha-se lembrado que no dia do desaparecimento de MADELEINE, apesar de todo o barulho e alarido provocado pelas autoridades e outras pessoas que estava à procura de MADELEINE no apartamento A5 do OCEAN CLUB, os gémeos nunca acordaram, tendo sido transportados para outro apartamento sempre a dormir, pelo que agora presumia que estivessem sob o efeito de alguma droga sedativa, que um presumível raptor teria administrado nas três crianças, para que pudesse raptar a MADELEINE, situação que KATE referiu ser possível pois segundo terá lido num manual de investigação criminal que lhe foi cedido pelas autoridades inglesas, aquele terá sido o procedimento do raptor num caso real que envolveu o rapto, abuso sexual e homicídio de uma menina.

Já no dia de hoje, quando o signatário se deslocou à residência temporária do casal a fim de os notificar a comparecer nas instalações da Polícia para prestar declarações, podendo fazer-se acompanhar de defensor, de imediato KATE MCCANN reagiu negativamente, tendo feito comentários tais como, “o que é que os meus pais vão pensar” e “o que é que a imprensa vai dizer quando souber” e que “a Polícia portuguesa está a sofrer pressões do Governo para que acabe rapidamente com a investigação”.

No que diz respeito a GERALD MCCANN, constantemente insistia em entregar ao signatário cartas e e-mails que ele ia recebendo, na sua maior parte provenientes de indivíduos psíquicos e médiuns, que haviam sido por ele próprio seleccionadas e que na sua maior parte continham informações sem grande credibilidade sobre o possível paradeiro de MADELEINE e do seu presumível raptor.

Mais recentemente, ainda antes do interrogatório de KATE MCCANN, num contacto telefónico de GERALD MCCANN com o signatário, foi referido por ele em relação à investigação, que tinha a certeza que a Polícia não tinha nenhuma prova que os pudesse incriminar relativamente à morte de MADELEINE MCCANN e referiu que a Polícia perdia tempo ao direccionar a investigação em torno dos pais.

É tudo quanto me cumpre levar ao conhecimento de V. Ex.ª para os fins tidos por convenientes.

O Inspector,

(Ricardo Paiva)



in: Processo 201/07.0 GALGS – págs. 2533 e 2534

English version can be read
here






14 comments:

  1. Sorry, me too. We can't read Portugal! Please, help!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The link for the English translation is always given, when possible at the bottoM of the article : http://themaddiecasefiles.com/post2919.html#p2919

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sons of a bitch, trying to incriminate Robert Murat.
    How I hope their lives are HELL, getting worse every second of every day, and that they will live long, very long with their guilt, with Madddie's ghost visiting them every night and people around them knowing the truth: the child is dead.
    Their death would free them of suffering and I don't wish them any peace.
    I vomit this couple and I will stop vomitting them when the twins start doing it.
    O yeah, they are teaching the twins to remain loving Madeleine, on a obsessive way, and the result of these lessons will be a much stronger love for their sister and they will hate their parents
    and even try to reopen the process, when they become 18, and if the case will not be yet solved.
    Growing up with such a parents, they will know the couple very well, their eventual tendences,they will have each other to talk about what eventually could have happen to their little sister, they will read about this story.A 12, 13 years old child can understand files.They will judge the parents'friends behaviours, they will observe those friends around,they will hear rumours about them too.
    Someday parents of their shool-fellows will start talking.

    And I fear the twins will not make friends who could come to their home, to play with them.
    Too risky.
    The twins will be lonesome.

    I request whoever knows what happened to Madeleine, to tell the police and the CEOP.
    Maddie's life is already destroyed, please save the twins in their lonesome and risky lives.

    ReplyDelete
  4. THANK YOU JOANA! GOD BLESS YOUR BLOG!

    ReplyDelete
  5. When Gerry made his documentary in Praia da Luz, Matthew Oldfield joined him, very much on Gerry's insistence, I presume.
    Matthew was not happy at all on the video.
    I was reading his statements and my conclusion is that he got involved in a case that did not concern him at all. By accident.
    And he was obliged to support the Mccanns.
    Or maybe not...
    Perhaps he could be like Payne and the police still don't have any clues about him.

    People around Matthew must suspect him as well, he must have gotten a bad name.
    I wonder if his children will not have difficulties to make friends aswell, if there are eventual rumours around the Oldfields, specilally because Rachel "recognized" Murat. Was she hiding bad tendences of her husband's, was she afraid the PJ would find out something about him?

    Did he go all the way back to Praia da Luz not only to protect the Mccanns but also to protect himself?

    I would not allow my children to play at his home.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Matthew Oldfield speaks about going for a jog with Kate the day before- in one of his first interviews, in spite of bad weather and his partner and child being ill in their apartment

    ReplyDelete
  7. Regarding Mathew O. I read somewhere in the newspaper, when Kate and Gerry became Arguidos that one of the Tapas 7( Mat.O?) had a process against him in England regarding a medical negligence from which a man died. Gerry was a witnesse. Maybe this can explain why M.O. had no chance to be out of the story.


    I still pointing out something which now still giving the police a lot of crucial information to solve the case:

    2 weeks after the last planetarium campaign to ask information about Madeleine or somebody close to the abductor, NO SIGHTS OF MADDIE, NO WITNESSES O PERSON'S OF INTERESS" . HUMMMM, that can mean two things- MADELEINE ECONOMICAL FUND WAS NOT SO HEALTH AS THE MCCANN'S PRETEND TO SHOW THE WORLD.... they don't pay ennough to have fake sights or fake witnesses.
    -PEOPLE ARE AFFRAID TO GET CONNECTED WITH MCCANN'S CASE AND EVEN PAYING SOMEBODY TO LIE IN A NEWSPAPER AND SPREAD THE LIE AS AN AVALANCHE, WAS NOT EASY. The evils are not available anymore. What looks like a easy and good businness can end-up as a nightmare. No evils to have a sight of Madeleine in Africa?

    Ashame CEOP. The updated 6 years old Madeleine was a waste of time and money.
    SUCESSFUL AND METHEORIC BUSINNESS DON'T LAST LONGER, TEND TO BE VOLATIL. In Portugal we use to say " dinheiro que e mal ganho, e mal gasto".

    CEOP, if you don't want to loose everything, insist with PRIESTS. The Priests must come across to say what peraphs they know. The British priest in Portugal, suddenly become one of the best friends of the Mccann's. His girl played Madeleine rule on Gerry movie at PDL. And the portuguese priest become so affected by the situation that he refuse to talk about it. Why Madeleine change the life of that priests?

    ReplyDelete
  8. OK, medical negligence, the man died, if it is true.This was longer than 2.5 years ago and I don't believe M O organized a fraudulent fund to help himself.And I don't believe the rest of the family of the dead patient is now at risk because of M O.
    After at least 2.5 years of that patient's death we have to look forward and concentrate on the child offender(s)who could strike again.
    And I again wonder why Rachel pointed to Murat and M.O. went back
    to Praia da Luz.Could it have been only because of a medical mistake?
    I hope the British police will investigate the Oldfield's lives.
    I hope the CEOP will do the same.

    In this world there are a lot of children at risk.

    ReplyDelete
  9. an.7,
    yes, no news about Madeleine.But at least to our knowledge.
    The police never tell immediately what they have been told.
    They have to analise everything before they do it, if they do.


    And this time the Mccanns will not dare to fabricate a new story.
    The video is coming from the CEOP and who knows people are contacting this organisation rather than contacting the police.
    We don't know.

    And I hope somebody will tell about the Oldfield, if he knows something about them.

    I bet somebody might know.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anon. 8,

    Now he medical negligence has more then 2,5 years, at the time Maddie disapeared not and Gerry was the PRO-Witness.

    Anon.9,

    The Mccann's never wait for the police to check any sight which they can use on their own agenda, in the Media. They are criticised and knowed by not folowing anything untill the end. The much far they went, was the Hewlett in German, God know's why. Maybe they strong believe that his weak health can be used to easily corrupt him with some money. He remain untouchable and became a cold baket to the Mccann's team. Moroccos, Barcelona and Sweeden were charades. The journalists arrived before the detectives and local polices never gave any importance to that sights.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Never forget that Jim Gamble and CEOP were partly responsible for the hostile treatment Robert Murat received in those early days! CEOP profiled Murat and decided he was a strong match for Maddie's alleged raptor! What is not clear (to me anyway) is if David Payne was also profiled by CEOP and what information was used when profiling Murat. Surely, it was not just the fact that LORI CAMPBELL claimed that he reminded her of the child killer Ian Huntley and/or the Tapas 3 saying they saw him that night and Jane Tanner saying he was bundleman and Kate saying she had a bad premonition and the fact he was recently divorced with a young daughter and living with his mum etc? Surely, CEOP had more solid information to use in their profiling?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Do you think that Gamble will be passing on info to the McCanns which he receives?

    To be quite honest this is turning into a farce, and it is about time the official investigators stepped in and stopped the interference by these people who appear to be hand in glove with the McCanns.

    The PJ themselves should reopen the case, if only so that they are the first to receive any information which would be treated in confidence and not passed on to the McCanns.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The McCanns are heading this investigation - I thought you knew all that? :)) I wish the emoticons would work?

    Louise

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yes, it's like the inmates running the asylum.

    It gets crazier and crazier.

    ReplyDelete