20 February 2010

Kate and Gerry McCann accuse British Government of hampering search for Madeleine




By Steve Myall


Kate and Gerry McCann yesterday accused the British Government of hampering the search for their missing daughter.

They claim Portuguese cops have leads to Madeleine's disappearance but they have been unable to access them.

The couple say despite meetings with Gordon Brown and top UK officials, the three-year investigation has stalled.

And they claim red tape is blocking their own inquiries using private detectives.

After their successful attempt to maintain a legal ban on publication of a book which claims Madeleine is dead, Gerry, 41, called for a complete review of the case.

He said: "There are certainly instances where information we think is very credible and worthy of further investigation has not been actioned."


in: Mirror, 20.02.2010

118 comments:

  1. Looks like this is a strike before your foe strikes, strategy. We know there might have been a visit from the ambassador in the early stages of this case.

    ReplyDelete
  2. who the f***,are these people are they of this world?? please will some one arrest them and lock them up.they are a f****** disgrace,as parents and as human beings.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Don't shout too loudly, Gerry... someone might actually take you up on your double bluff and get the case re-opened...

    And that's not really what you want is it?

    You say that the only path of enquiry that was pursued vigorously was to investigate you & Kate. You are hoping that new avenues will be investigated and that you are in the clear.

    Did you listen to any of the police officers who testified for Dr. Amaral? They believe you are involved, so do the British police. They are hardly going to pursue other avenues.

    You'd be better off slinking under a stone than annoying a hornets nest...

    ReplyDelete
  4. is this some sort of warning to someone in goverment,(help us out here or else)hmmmm,every thing i have read about these two (bad excuses for parents) they do seem to have people in gov and the leicestershire police up there ar**

    ReplyDelete
  5. The only evidence that was overlooked was the DNA evidence found by Eddie and Keela .

    As far as I can gather , the McCanns then paid for their own DNA experts who came up with the negative results . And now they claim , " red tape is blocking thier own inquiries using private detectives ." The bloody cheek of them !

    ReplyDelete
  6. I thought the British government helped them. They gave them a spokesperson or two. Looks like they are trying to cross t's and dot i's for when things start to spill out.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Letter fom Iberia
    Perhaps the Portuguese government European legislation to extradite the McCann’s to answer for the crime of putting Madeleine and their other children in danger by abandoning them alone in a strange apartment in a strange country whilst they went out with their swinging friends

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yeah he is trying to pretend that he wants the authorities to look into the case. All total BS as he knows they will do nothing. Why would they do anything, no need as the suspects are known. The Police are not looking for anyone else as is often said in such cases. Its patently obvious to everyone bar complete fools who is responsible its just the s details that we are missing.

    ReplyDelete
  9. " And they claim red tape is blocking their own inquiries using private detectives." WONDER WHY?! IS BECAUSE THE BRITTISH POLICE BELIEVE ON MCCANN'S INNOCENCE AND ON THEIR ABDUCTION THEORY.... THEN THE EVILS ARE NOT ONLY IN PJ, ARE ALSO IN UK.... HAVE YOU SEEN THAT MRS ISABEL DUARTE? I HOPE MADDIE SOUL WILL FOLLOW YOU ALL YOUR LIFE.
    RED TAPE- CONFIDENTIAL, EXTREMELLY CONFIDENTIAL!!!! AND ARE THIS PRIVATE DETECTIVES LEGAL IN UK? In Portugal are not. AND HOW MANY TIMES THE LEICESTER PoLICE AND THE PRIVATE DETECTIVES SHARE THE INFORMATION WHICH EACH ONE ACHIEVED? NEVER!!! NEVER!!!! THIS SAYS ALL........ And the Mccann's will die one day trough their own mouths!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. When they came back "arguidos", the Coffin complained about not succeeding a meeting with GB, but only a second level one that they refused.

    ReplyDelete
  11. In one newspaper it says they can barely keep their head above water. I wonder if they will sell the house because of all the legal fees. Perhaps they didn't get as much as they thought at the party.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This is a strategy to silence the criticism of the "antys" which are saying that they use the Media to attack PJ. DANGEROUS THIS TWO.
    NEXT WEEK THEY WILL BE BACK TO THEIR BUSINNESS- ASKING DONATIONS FOR THEM, POOR PARENTS, WHICH NEED THE MONEY TO LOOK FOR THEIR DAUGHTER, EVEN IF THEY NEVER EVER EVER EFFECTIVELLY STAND THEIR A..... TO WENT OUT AND SEARCH FOR THEIR Daughter.

    ReplyDelete
  13. A change of target...
    Although they are quite "constant":everybody is to blame but them.Everybody is responsible for Madeleine"s fate but them...the spin goes on,doesnt it?Are they still feeling "delighted and overjoyed" do you think? :))

    ReplyDelete
  14. then... That means incompetence at the British police? GERRY YOU SHOULD ASK THE HEAD OF WHO IS INCHARGED OF THE CASE AT LEICESTER POLICE, BECAUSE ACCORDING TO MY MEMORY. G. BROWN ANSWER A LETTER FROM MADELEINE FUNDATION REGARDING THE INVESTIGATION IN UK, SAYING THAT THE INVESTIGATION WAS "ON" ALL THE TIME WITH LEICESTER POLICE WORKING TOGETHER WITH PJ AND SHARING ALL THE INFORMATION. GERRY ARE YOU INFORMING THE WORLD THAT GORDON BROWN LIE? Then... step forward, ASK THE HEAD OF GORDON BROWN AND THE HEAD OF THE HEAD OFFICE. What are you waiting for? Do you think, your daughter did not deserve it? We know, you believe she is in good care and not harm....ASK THE HEAD OF GORDON BROWN TROUGH SKY NEWS!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Crikey! talk about biting the hand that feeds you! It is the British Government who had them flown out of Portugal when they were made argudos. It is the British Government who provided them with Clarence Mitchell. It is the British Government who has been protecting them since day one!

    ReplyDelete
  16. The McCann’s responsible for the death of their daughter ???????????????
    You may think that I could not possibly comment

    Letter from Iberia

    ReplyDelete
  17. Now I think they have lost it.

    Another amazing thing has happened today - I have had a comment posted on Daily Mail site - first time ever for me! It said no review was needed, just ask the police to re-open the case and they will do it. Several others said similar and people can only conclude 1 thing now, that is, they don't want the case re-opened. Everyone must come to their own conclusion as to why that is.

    ReplyDelete
  18. despite meetings with Gordon Brown?
    according to interview with sandra felgueiras and according to clarence mitchell they never met gordon brown personally.
    these people are sick, arent they?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Not a review, Gordon Brown. Get this case re-opened fast.

    ReplyDelete
  20. YES 14. But they have to discredit everybody. They have to find a way to transform private detectives into official polices, no matter if this will be an exception. They believe and they act as GOD, THE OWNERS OF THE TRUTH, THE OWNERS OF THE ONLY TRUTH WHICH IS ACCEPTABLE-ABDUCTION. they will destroy everything they touch, even their own child's.... starting on Madeleine and finishing with twins.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Maybe Gerry is looking to join David Cameron in the Tory party now that Gordon Brown has lost all credibility. After all David is much more up market and suits their status perfectly now. He and Kate, I'm sure, would just love to join him for tapas and wine at No. 10!

    If you really want people to believe you are leaving no stone unturned Kate and Gerry, go back with your pals and do that reconstruction, answer the 48 questions for the PJ, and take a lie detector test! Simple really!

    ReplyDelete
  22. Their greed and their arrogance will be their downfall,and when Goncarlo Amaral is finally vindicated i hope he sues them and the spineless British Press,to me this case has now become as much about this honourable mans good name as it is about little Madeleine.I wish that Madeleine could send a message out from wherever she lies to the world,so that she can be found and given a proper resting place,God Bless her.

    ReplyDelete
  23. This is not anymore a question of a forbidden book, a question of finding a corpse, a question of talking or not to Gordon Brown.
    This is a extremely serious question.
    It is the question of saving the twins, who are in the hands of insane parents.
    They are not normal, very much disturbed.
    Authorities got to see this.
    Besides none of both look well on the photo above.

    ReplyDelete
  24. If I hear the expressions "a lttle girl is missing" or "we are her parents" one more time, I will scream. They have used these phrases like mantras. We know the above facts only too well and put together, they have a wealth of meaning for most of us here.

    ReplyDelete
  25. just had a thought on this,its because they are very well protected that they can say and do what they like. so that tells me that they did have something to do with madeleines death as why would they need protecting if madeleine was ok.

    ReplyDelete
  26. It's right here, in Joana's blog (see top of home page):

    "It is true that we have requested a meeting with the prime minister to show him the strength of our case, to explain Kate and Gerry's innocence and yet all we've been offered is a medium-level-consular meeting, which we rejected."

    From the mouth of Mitchell himself!

    But now they claim that despite meetings with Brown and high level(not medium) officials nothing has moved forward!

    SPIN AND LIES, ENDLESS SPIN AND LIES!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anon 16. The DM printed my comment too. I said about reopening the case.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I nearly fell off my chair laughing when I read this headline. My goodness, they never stop spinning do they? Talk about double bluff.

    Now that they have read all the blogs about how they are being protected by "very powerful unseen forces" (like no other person in a criminal investigation) they are now pretending to distance themselves from the "very powerful unseen forces".

    Excuse me Gerry but wasn't Pinkie sent by your mates in the UK Government to protect and spin for you both at all costs and to impede the investigation, wasn't he working for the UK government before his job was suddenly curtailed and he hotfooted it to PDL to spin any story on your behalf to the press. Who else in the investigation of a missing child has had that luxury and he is still spinning for you 3 years later.

    Didn't you have the telephone number for Gordon Brown, how many people involved in a criminal investigation would be given that?

    Pull the other one Gerry, you can spin as much as you like, but the UK Government have done too much to protect you and Kate, any other Joe Blogs would have been properly investigated 3 years ago and sentenced by now.

    ReplyDelete
  29. #20, they surelly seem to have secured their position with the main portuguese oposition party PSD, as we were about to have an election. It was said that Gerry McCann, through the hands of his lawyer Rogério Alves had a meeting with an important member of the said party. I would not be surprised if they did the same in Britain, keep all fronts covered! That is why I do not put my hopes in any political change of powers(it would have to be a complete cathaclismic one for anything good to come out of it). If what is at the bottom of this case is what may suspect, paedophilia, no political wings or justice system will ever expose them. That disgusting practice is present, is transversal to all extracts of society. No matter what party is in office, there will always be some big fish assuring that there will be no revelations!

    ReplyDelete
  30. When those people gonna accuse themselves for whatever happened to their daughter?

    ReplyDelete
  31. ..."the three-year investigation has stalled."

    Here we go again! How can there be a 3 year investigation? The case was archived in 2008, and the McCanns have just recently claimed, once again, that there is NO police force looking for Madeleine!
    The investigation is stalled since the archiving day, isn't it?
    Or do they mean that their government did not assist them with THEIR private investigation?...

    ReplyDelete
  32. Fro this daily Mail article:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1252286/McCanns-criticise-heartbreaking-failure-police-Madeleine-launch-fresh-appeal-help.html

    "The couple, both 41, fear that their own £2million investigation has hit a brick wall because British and Portuguese police have ignored the potential leads their private detectives have uncovered."

    Really? have their "detectives" sent information to the British and Portuguese police? Really? Is that the ignored evidence that Isabel Duarte talked about? If those leads were all like the one of the downunder Victoria B. lookalike, no wonder they were ignored!

    ReplyDelete
  33. Yes, anon at 17, I noticed that obvious 'meetings' - plural! with Gordon Brown, something which they or their spokesman have always denied.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Have they ever filled a missing-person complain with any British police force and asked for an official investigation? I don't think they have, and it was their right, wasn't it? And most of all it was Madeleine's right, she is british! Shouldn't Justice Hogg have done so too? Isn't Madeleine her responsability since the moment she was made a Ward of Court?
    So, what are they complaining about?

    ReplyDelete
  35. these two are very disturb in the head ,just hope someone in athority reads this blog as we all cant be wrong and some one needs to stop them now.

    ReplyDelete
  36. From the same Daily Mail article:

    "The McCanns acknowledged that there were political issues which could obstruct a Portuguese-English review, and that failures in the high-profile case have caused international embarrassment for the Portuguese government."

    Isn't it the other way around, Mr. and Mrs. McCann?
    Wasn't the british government the one who would be embarrassed?...
    I remember some documentation that could not be revealled due to national security(british) and that could jeopardise the relations between two sovereign countries(U.K. and Portugal)!

    ReplyDelete
  37. Sorry for yet another snippet of the D.Mail article:

    "A source close to the couple said: 'The reality is there will only be a new investigation if Portugal asks for one, and Portugal is just too proud to admit that it is needed."

    WHAT A BLATANT LIE!!!

    NO, dear "source close to the family"! You're so mistaken! It lies mainly in the hands of your precious McCanns. If Kate anwers the 48 questions and if the whole Tapas bunch agree to do the reconstruction the case will be reopened! It's your dear friends or relatives, the McCanns who are too proud, or more likely too scared to do the right thing and use their power to reopen the case!

    ReplyDelete
  38. I suppose they also think that they are the reason that Gordon will be thrown out at the next election ?

    Sick bastards

    ReplyDelete
  39. No surprises for anyone but the McCanns the police do not let civillians never mind those involved in a crime to run the investigation into themselves.

    Well Gerry just because Pinky was the head of the Media monitoring unit doesnt mean he has anyt clout with the government or the police we know that so do you.

    You can claim to speak to Gordon every morning on your own private line he's not in a position to say otherwise during an ongoing investigation. Aitkins won his libel case too and look where he ended up and he wasnt a wanna be politician.

    If I was prime minister beyond the first initial sympathy (grossly misplaced but how would I know until those damn dogs Gerry woof! woof!) I wouldnt bother with you either.

    ReplyDelete
  40. All this carry on about wanting a 'review' is making me think they may be worried that the case may get reopened instead.

    So they are constantly pounding on the idea of a 'review'. Over and over they go on about it. Trying to distract from a reopening.

    They must be really afraid of a reopening.

    Let's hope it gets reopened soon.

    ReplyDelete
  41. i wonder if this is to distract us all from the tanner and murat case,

    ReplyDelete
  42. 3-year investigation? Poor little Madeleine has not been missing for 3 years, yet. Can they see into the future and know that she will not be found by May 3rd, 2010?

    ReplyDelete
  43. Oh please, the only RED TAPE in their way is that the files they want, they can`t have.
    That now is what they want then they will know if they can beat this with their crap or if they should dream on.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Anon 3 and Anon 24 - You could be on the right track. I have wondered for a while now if some government agency had to help them move Maddie`s body because McCann threatened to spill the beans about something sordid and corrupt if they didn`t. CM is the middle man or ringmaster. It could well be that its the government that has possession of her dead body with all its evidence. Gerry has something on the government and the government has something on Gerry - nothing can move. I get the feeling that the McCanns now want rescuing from the people who are holding him to ransome and thats why he`s started pointing the finger at them.

    ReplyDelete
  45. What they really want is a review so they can 'rewrite' the investigation files as it suits them.
    Wouldn't be so much easier if there were no dogs in the files, only thousands of sightings all over the world ?...
    And even better if after that they can dismiss the PJ files completely, since now we would all have the new "reviewed" version.

    And then we would all know that they are 'cleared'.

    They, and what they stand for, make me sick!

    ReplyDelete
  46. I have always thought that the McConns and the tapas crew have something on each other,something that if one falls the rest will fall,so they all stick together,Gerry was/is in the labour movement,and was at one time going to stand for parliament,and when all this started,Cherie Blair spoke to Kate on the phone and asked if there was anything she and her husband could do to help,yes i bet they called on those favours.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Blame Robert Murat, Goncalo Amaral, Inspector Paiva, the PJ in general, Eddie and Keela, Tony Bennett, Raymond Hewlett, anti McCann bloggers and now the British Police and Government... who next?

    ReplyDelete
  48. Gerry McCann as MP! At least we've been spared that horrendous possibility.

    ReplyDelete
  49. The McCanns are in serious denial.

    McCanns - join the dots - accept that your mistake of leaving your children unattended led to the "loss" of one of your children. Your mistake is called neglect by the authorities. Neglect can arise from ignorance.

    So accept that in early May 2007, although you were both trained and practising doctors, neither of you had a clue as to how to adequately look after a child.

    Even in the darkest of Africa they will carry their child on their back rather than leaving it alone on the floor of a kraal.

    Whichever way Madeleine died, you are to blame, and no-one else. Accept it and move on. Drop the injunction against Amaral and back down generally. It would be better off for you in the long run to lay low and go on with your lives a large bit wiser than before May 2007.

    Confucius say "Be not afraid of mistakes and thus make them crimes"

    ReplyDelete
  50. Their own 2 million investigation has hit a brick wall!!

    Since when have they spent 2 million looking for Madeleine. They have lined their own pockets, lost money on dogey detectives not forgetting their lawyers and Clarence. Now Clarence admits the wider family as well are being helped by the fund. That is where the money is going. Have they no shame!!

    ReplyDelete
  51. Hang on a minute! I am getting very confused!

    Every version I have read of the Mccanns press conference it has been stated that "Our private investigators have passed credible leads onto the Portugese authorities but they have refused to act upon them". "There are certainly instances where information we think is very credible and worthy of further investigation has not been actioned". They claim Portugese cops(such eloquence!) have leads to Madeleines disappearance but they have been unable to access them.

    Questions......,
    What exactly are you paying large sums of money to private investigators for? It would appear from your statement that they are passing information to the Portugese on your behalf - why can't you do that and thus cut out the middle man? Credible and worthy information has not been actioned - how do you know this?
    The Portugese have leads to the childs disappearance but you can't access them? Then please tell me how you know of these leads if you don't have access to them?

    Worthy and credible information not been actioned? Again why are you paying investigators if not to follow leads?

    Mr Mccann, you have many faults, one of which springs to the fore time and time again - YOU DON'T KNOW WHEN TO KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT!

    Viva Mr. Amaral!

    ReplyDelete
  52. They get more arrogant by the day ,but it will be their undoing ,and it cannot come quick enough for me ,EVERYONE is to blame for what happened to Maddie,apart from them

    ReplyDelete
  53. 44, yes, I thought more or less the same, long time ago.
    There is a British consulate in Portimao, 20km from Praia da Luz.
    For sure this consulate must have several employés from the UK.
    It is known that the British ambassador to Portugal abandonned his diplomatic carrier around the time the McCanns were declared arguidos.
    He kept his mouth about the reason.
    You can see him on Amaral's DVD, here on Joana's.
    After years and years of studies to become a diplomat, he leaves this opportunity forever.
    Why?
    And I noticed that Gerry wrote nearly nothing or nothing about visiting that consulate every week, to talk to the Portuguese police.
    He commented about their chats, not about where they were taking place.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Dis you look for the Hellish Lair of P. de Luz with Dodgy Dave? Of course not!

    ReplyDelete
  55. Not sure why youre confused SB Gerry told us his aims "to create information" from the horses mouth the truth; he's too educated not to have known what that statement means. I guess he thinks the plebs havent enough grasp or the ability or as his wife says are too inherently lazy to look it up- may I remind Kate that those she is seeking to silence have looked it up.

    They didnt float as a victim of Portuguese police what makes them think theyre any more believable as a victim of British police too is beyond comprehension.

    ReplyDelete
  56. I have just read the EXPRESS newspaper online and wait for it.........

    They are allowing comments on the McCann story................

    ReplyDelete
  57. Warning shot across the bows, isn't it. No more pretend policemen hassling witnesses who may incriminate you, no more Victoria Beckham look-a-like possible kidnappers in red light districts of Barcelona - especially when they turn out to be stinking rich and rather well connected - 'you're becoming a bit of a liablity old chap.'

    Of course Gerry's ego can't stand for that. He's important now! Nobody tells old Gerry what to do.

    Is he really going to take them all down with him? This should be fun.

    ReplyDelete
  58. What is Postman Pat[Alan Johnson] thinking of meeting with these two scum? I know our country is now run by criminals but this is ridiculous. What next, McCann for Prime Minister?
    If they want a review start by answering the 48 questions the PJ were asking.

    ReplyDelete
  59. The McCann's insatiable need to be in the public spotlight will be their downfall. They enjoy being on TV and in the papers and rubbing elbows with celebrities and because they have gotten away with so much they have the false belief that they are invincible. Narcissists can be successful for a long time but eventually the world they created for themselves will come tumbling down with disastrous consequences.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Anon 56 - They seem to have changed their minds now. I got "Have your say is unavailable for this article".

    Louise

    ReplyDelete
  61. They must be SO thick skinned ,have you read all the anti-Mc comments on the Daily Mail page? even the odd pro Mc posts are full of red arrows ,they must think they are so special ,well I have news for them ......they are not ,the public are sick of them and their begging bowl

    ReplyDelete
  62. 44 if the British government were involved why do you think they moved Madeleine in the boot of the McCanns hire car? The British overnment knew within hours remember. Are you honestly expecting us to believe that MI whatever had to get them to hire a car for their agents to use- I didnt know the UK was that broke. Perhaps the whip around didnt amount to a cab fare or theyre all non drivers?

    As for Clarrie being the major ringmaster? Are you watching the same guy as me? This isnt a man with the full clout of power behind him but a man desperate to spin his clients out of jail as long as possible.

    As for Gerry now pointing the finger if that were the case wouldnt he'd be desperate to get to the PJ to get a deal, to be safe? How hard do you think it would be to get rid of nobodies like the McCanns if you were prepared to?

    The McCanns to my mind come over as typical criminals , clever ones who have played on peoples sympathy but now realise that any control they have over events is an illusion; theyre on borrowed time and they know it. Criminals invariably play the victim card most people in jail claim or claimed they were innocent victims of injustice and the McCanns are no different- they just have PR and do so through the media. Thats nothing to do with the government or police just money.

    ReplyDelete
  63. There are many who are not happy with the mccanns accusations
    of neglect.

    They are and have been for some time,fully aware that
    the british police force will not act upon the false trail of distraction they try to set.

    They are however,unaware of the discontent their fabrications
    are creating amongst those they blame.



    @notts

    ReplyDelete
  64. The Express is allowing comments. They have even printed one about the dogs. Finally the British newspapers are not stifling freedom of speech.

    ReplyDelete
  65. poster 64 ,I have just had 2 messages posted ,they didnt even wait to censor them ,this is great !!! have your say while you have the chance

    ReplyDelete
  66. No matter what a review of the case may bring there are questions that the McCanns and Company need to answer as there are far too many that still remain unaswered. (48?)

    Now we have "Red Tape" hindering the case, not so long ago "Red Herrings". Police I would imagine look for "Red Alerts" when investigating a crime

    No one can turn back time or undo what has been stated, from the very begining the "Red Alerts" were investigated, especially the one where the alleged abductor used the broken/jemmied shutters to either enter or leave the apartment, when this was shown not to be the truth "REd Herring" came into play,(the abductor opened the window as a "Red Herring"

    The dogs "Red Alert" McCanns dismissed the findings as un-reliable, but from what I can gather came up with KM dealing with corpses before the holiday. I ask is this a "Red Herring"

    Jane Tanners sighting "Red Alert" R. Murat became a suspect.Another "Red Herring" ???

    It seems the McCann Company think that they are immune to "Red Alerts" but any Police Invesigation I would imagine needs to address these alerts as priority.

    As for no Police Authority looking for Maddie, I would image that although the case is shelved not closed it is still under investigation, maybe this is "Red Tape" A proper ongoing investigation without interference from the McCann Company.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Anon 64,the express are indeed allowing comments,i just left one about the dogs and other things,and it was printed unlike the Mail who didn't, but one's better than none,perhaps the press are beginning to open their eyes and realising that the public can stop buying their papers if they don't practice fair play.

    ReplyDelete
  68. I really believe that we are witnessing the end game here.

    As someone who has had very close connections with the Police and associated agencies, I have a sneaking feeling that both the Portuguese and British Police have been playing this case by the book and over a very long period, with the help of criminal profilers and psychologists.

    They have had to accept the "slings and arrows" of outraged personages, because that will have been part of their strategy to force errors and fatal slip-ups by their targets.

    For obvious reasons, I do not wish to offer speculation which may possibly endanger what the respective Police forces are trying to achieve, other than to say that I am (with justified cause) a total disbeliever in "conspiracy theories".

    Just be patient people and watch this space - you may be very pleasantly surprised - truth and justice will most definitely ultimately win through.

    ReplyDelete
  69. @44. Yes - I am along those lines of thinking too. Remember, police will always try to solve a crime... UNLESS SOMEBODY STOPS THEM. WHY have the British police been so quiet? Why are they allowing their counterparts in Portugal to take the flack? As for CM, you know when he is lying... his lips move! :-)

    Did anybody other than myself, see the Martin Brunt report from PDL on the day KM refused to answer the 48 questions during her final interview? Brunt stated she was going to be charged with Madeleine's accidental death. Yet, that never happened? KM's lawyer was present, so who stopped this from going ahead?

    Either the PJ changed their minds...
    Or Martin Brunt was given the wrong information...
    Or somebody in high authority STOPPED IT FROM HAPPENING.

    That's the only logic I can think of. The video was on YT for some time and I downloaded it (as videos have a habit of 'disappearing' where these pair are concerned). The SKY News report however, was shortlived and not seen again.

    And if the McCanns read this blog, so what? I don't believe them and THAT IS MY FREE DEMOCRATIC RIGHT. Spin all you like... we know we are not being told the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Has the wind shifted slightly. I expected a lengthy article in the McCann friendly Sun, but only a short one - maybe a more lengthy one is planned for the sister paper News of the Word. Good to see comments in the Daily Express and to some extent the Daily Mail.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Anon 62 - I`m not `honestly expecting you to believe` anything you don`t want to believe. I have said its just my opinion and you don`t have to resort to cynicism and ridicule my opinion - there are other more seedy websites where you can do that.

    I don`t think the government `agents` or whatever moved the body in the McCann`s hire car. I think the hire car could have been contaminated by an item that the body had been wrapped in previously, same with the keys.

    As for Clarrie, I do think he may still possibly be working for the government and is there to monitor the McCanns and keep things balanced so they don`t blab, but also to make is seem as if they are innocent. It`s just my opinion remember and this is a discussion forum.

    Anyway I shall take your comments on board.

    Anon 44.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Thanks 67 - I was looking at the previous story.
    Louise

    ReplyDelete
  73. Oh dear! The McCanns have really done it now. The floodgates have finally opened & the public ain't happy. Bring it on & lets finally have justice for this poor child whose trust, innocence & very name was shamelessly betrayed by her own selfish and arrogant family & their equally shameless and arrogant friends.

    http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/159385/-Heart-breaking-failures-in-search-for-our-Madeleine

    ReplyDelete
  74. Open letter to Kate and Gerry McCann

    Please,Please,Please
    Stop all the acting,stop blaming others for your mistakes,
    It was you who went out on the piss leaving babies unattended,and yes they were babies!!
    Kate it was you who refused to answer Police questions,
    Gerry it was you who was too busy jetsetting around the world to go out and look for Maddie.
    Stop trying to con the world,the public are not as stupid as you make out.

    And PLEASE just for once think about Sean and Amelie,try being good parents to them.You have already let them down and that will come back to haunt you one day,not for a few years but when they are old enough to fully understand.Like all other cases of child abuse the truth will come out!

    ReplyDelete
  75. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-480630/Kate-McCann-fears-charged-today-police-push-confession.html

    I was searching for the latest article on the Daily Mail website and found this from 2007. A very interesting read. How did they have managed to shift the focus (in the Press) from being suspects to victims?.

    The photos are telling - If you compare them from Sept 2007 to the latest press conference they have aged far beyond their years. The pressure must be on.

    ReplyDelete
  76. This red tape that is getting in the way of their private investigation- is that the fact that their PI's have no legal right to question suspects, no access to any police databases for background checks, no acess to databases for car registration plates, no access to anything official which could help them 'snoop' on people who are disbelievers (I bet they would love to have all the names/addresses of all the antis on here. And have access to our bank accounts to see who is worth sueing.)In short they seem to be moaning because the PI's are not allowed to operate above the law. I think the more they moan and call 'foul' against everyone in the entire world, the worse it will be for them, eventually they will piss someone off that they really shouldn't..............

    ReplyDelete
  77. The Express comments seem to be all Anti bar one at the moment. Not much sympathy for the saintly duo I'm afraid. Gerry must be getting a very bad report from his 'Media Monitors'.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Is there anyone they haven't blamed yet? The Queen, maybe? The Pope? President Obama?

    They're beyond ridiculous now, with their mad allegations against all and sundry, yet knowing that everybody knows who's to blame for this whole sorry mess ... THEMSELVES!

    If they keep up their present nastiness they can be pretty well assured to be the most hated couple in Britain within a very short space of time.

    ReplyDelete
  79. I`m wondering what`s going on with the Express because they seem to be allowing a lot of comments. Is this because they know the McCanns wouldn`t dare sue them again. If the McCanns bring anymore libel actions, they`d really show themselves up as mental.

    Louise

    ReplyDelete
  80. poster 73 ,oh yes ,the cracks are appearing ,Thursdays result could well be the straw that breaks the camels back ,they have already got over-confident ,and if possible more smug than they were before ,I have never seen so much anti-Mc feelings as what is on the Express and Mail website ,and being allowed to post something anti !!! whoopee doo ....they are coming to get you Kate and Gerry,be scared,be very scared (just as Maddie was when she woke up and you were not there)not a nice feeling is it ?

    ReplyDelete
  81. I too am baffled Loius? and ALL of them negative ,not one defending them ,I bet they wish they had kept their mouths shut !! they should remember the old saying "Never bite the hand that feeds you "and the media has been their mealticket (along with Maddie) for nearly 3 years now

    ReplyDelete
  82. Anon 76

    We have no idea what the people the McCanns have been using as PIs have had access to.

    There have been some very shady characters amongst them, and Halligen was an expert in snooping.

    Will he ever say what he actually did for the McCanns? Hopefully we may get to know eventually.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Can you believe this message of mine has just been allowed on the Express site ?Im in shock !!
    This is just getting silly now ,But thank you SO MUCH Express for letting anti Mc Scams messages to be posted ,IF they had not been wrapped in cotton wool by the British media for nearly 3 years ,they would have been behind bars and **** would have got the justice she so deserves a long time ago ,The British media has run scared of these 2 long enugh now ,lets bring this case into the open ,PLEASE for **** start printing all you know on the case ,I have been looking into this case for nearly 3 years now ,there is SO much that you need to bring into the open ,the Mc Canns have dictated long enough now ,the crafty way they have turned themselves from being the baddies into being the victims is disgusting ,there is only one victim ,and that is **** ,PLEASE help bring her the decent burial she deserves

    ReplyDelete
  84. "The couple, both 41, fear that their own £2million investigation has hit a brick wall because British and Portuguese police have ignored the potential leads their private detectives have uncovered." DM

    What a joke.... Is Daily mail saying that Isabel Duarte lie in court? Because she said that her clients did not know the sights before she went to Portimao and pass them the information. HOW CAN THE PRIVATE DETECTIVES PASS THE INFORMATION TO PJ WITHOUT LETING THE MCCANN's know it? More lies. they insist in more lies using the Media. A shame for the judge which decide in Portugal to protect this psychopaths and compulsive liars.

    ANNOTHER DARK DAY FOR PORTUGAL TODAY WITH TRAGEDY IN MADEIRA. All my solidarity to the people which loss family, friends or belongs today due the heavy rain. Again the country and all the Portuguese around the world, should stay together to fight this adversity.

    Since the Mccann's and their team several times connected Madeira with Paedophile rings and invite the clairvoyant lawyer Aragao to persecute Amaral, I hope now they have a word to Madeira people instead of spreading more lies and spinning at the media.

    ReplyDelete
  85. No 3: I think you are right. This is a threat from Gerry to the Gov. or to some people in high places and that now the media allow comments is a threat to Gerry. Do you remember when the McConns were in Lisboa. One day the media started to write critical articles about the Mc's and Gerry returned to London immediately. And the next days the media coverage were pro-Mäc - as supplied before. They played this game a few times in the last 2,5 years. I hope someone will finish this theatre.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Wowowwo ,the Express has posted the Gaspars statement i copied and pasted !!

    ReplyDelete
  87. Wow! Gasper statement: back through the back door in Express comments at 9.10!
    Was someone dozing?

    ReplyDelete
  88. 69 % 71 Im not spinning why would I? I just dont believe everything I read nor do I believe that humour cant be used whatever the persons 'side'. I posted at the express and the three A's and never held back and took it too deservedly so at times. However if I upset you Im sorry I didnt intend to.

    The truth I was the only one that put forward a name regarding D notices and pedophillia that name was Gordon Brown- no one else had the guts. is I can find no logical explanation which places Madeleines body and I do believe it was her body (remember there were large quantities of her hair found)in the hire car other than the tapas friends.

    As for the report on TV it takes more than that to make a case against people Ive looked at it from every angle and became convinced that there wasnt enough evidence to link the McCanns to the crime at that time. In ongoing investigations there is a media clamp down - which the police control until after the jury has heard the evidence - that unfortunatey left the Mccanns to spin their own version of events one that has proven to be highly unbeneficial to them and highly revealing for the rest of us. Im not sure thats what happened but as you say it is a discussion forum; if my way of presenting my views upset anyone I apologise to them also.

    ReplyDelete
  89. I`m getting a bit worried now - the Express might have been told to allow negative comments so the McCanns can prove their reputations have been damaged - don`t go overboard peeps.

    Louise

    ReplyDelete
  90. Keep it credible on the Express pleeeeeese. I know its hard to resist spouting off.

    ReplyDelete
  91. I expect GM is on the phone right now blowing a gasket to Gordon and Rupert. He`ll go to the very top you know. He`ll ask to speak to Gordon Brown`s Manager.

    Louise

    ReplyDelete
  92. Is this report:

    a) The Mccans needing to show a gap between themselves and the government because they know that the government has dumped them...so they need to get in first PR wise?

    b) the government trying to show distance itself from the MCcans

    c) a warning to someone in government???

    ReplyDelete
  93. Clarrie is in charge of what goes out in the media, isn't he ?
    After today's Express comments will he still be employed tomorrow ?

    Come on Clarrie. How's the girl from Barcelona ?

    ReplyDelete
  94. Anon.#86,

    I'm reading the readers comments to the article, all very critical of the "golden couple". I wonder how they are being published and for how long they will remain there.
    One thing very weird, why is Madeleine's name replace by ****, and the family surname( McCann)too? But the first names, Kate and Gerry appear. So weird, does this mean that the public cannot mention the child's name or the family name?! A new bright idea from "Carter-you-know-what"?

    ReplyDelete
  95. Everyone is having a field day on the Express site ..Kate and Gerry may soon be wishing they had kept thier mouths shut !!!

    ReplyDelete
  96. Comments are published instantly in the Daily Express, without moderation!

    http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/159385/-Heart-breaking-failures-in-search-for-our-Madeleine

    ReplyDelete
  97. Louise ≠79, I agree, any more lawsuits from the McCanns would be the last straw, IMO. For people supposedly wishing to give their time and money to the search for their missing child to be seen spending their time and money suing everybody they can think of looks just a little bit odd. Well, more than a little bit - very, very odd indeed.

    People are simply telling the McCanns what they think, something every person has a right to do. The overall impression is that people are irritated beyond belief by this circus and are refusing to keep silent any longer. The McCanns' complaints and demands have obviously aroused real anger among members of the public, especially as they've seen the massive amount of help, sympathy and money given to Madeleine's parents, far more than has ever been given to any other parents of a missing child. Instead of expressing their gratitude, the McCanns attack, complain, berate and demand, seemingly having no idea how their behaviour and words come across to other people.

    They go on about what Madeleine deserves from other people, what rights Madeleine has now, seemingly blind to the irony that Madeleine deserved parents who ensured her safety by taking proper care of her, and Madeleine had rights before she disappeared, such as the right to be more important than her parents' social life.

    Managing to keep a temporary injunction on a book may have gone to their heads somewhat - they may now feel they can demand whatever they want and get it. But perhaps they should remember that you pay for everything in this life, if not in one way, then in another.

    ReplyDelete
  98. poster 90 ,i understand what you are saying ,but it so rare to get a chance to speak your mind in the British press

    ReplyDelete
  99. Annon 89

    Yes that is possible, as for my own opinion, it was formed without the aid of any any book, forum, or web-site.
    The fact that these two eejits left 3 babies (and lets not mince words here because thats what they were..babies) alone for their own selfish reasons for most of the week, the fact that they did not even bother their arse to look for their 'abducted' baby on that night, and then she goes and washes cuddlecat.....which would have had the very essence of her baby on it ??????????......that was enough for me.
    No, no book or adverse publicity damaged them in my eyes, they did that all by themselves......

    lindi

    ReplyDelete
  100. Dimsie 97 - I agree, but I`m just suspicious about why, all of a sudden, the Express are allowing this. I suppose I`ve become distrusting of the media and those in power and think there must be a motive behind all this. I thought the owner was Rupert Murdoch but its not, its Richard Desmond - why the turnaround on his part - he must have given the go ahead.

    Louise

    ReplyDelete
  101. Ah well - knew it couldn`t last - the Express have withdrawn all comments. Gerry must have threatened someone.

    Louise

    ReplyDelete
  102. Just look at Gerry`s smirking face in the picture - he`s pulled it off again. I can`t stand it. ~x(

    When the clock struck midnight, the fun was over.

    Louise

    ReplyDelete
  103. Well looks like the EXPRESS is back to their old ways.... Sunday Express now says on the latest Mc story 'have your say is unavailable for this story'............such cowards

    ReplyDelete
  104. Even the story has been pulled..if you look on the site there is a story for the 19th and 21st.......nothing for the 20th...

    ReplyDelete
  105. Comments pulled.
    I copied them beforehand though.
    :D

    ReplyDelete
  106. Annon 105

    Well Done, we must get them all ! can you beleive the express !

    ReplyDelete
  107. its gotten so laughable i feel sorry for them - STOP LYING and GO AWAY

    ReplyDelete
  108. WHO THEY GONNA BLAME NEXT - THE QUEEN?

    ReplyDelete
  109. Ah well ,thank you Express for allowing posting for a while ,a lot of us got a lot of things on that hopefully Mc`s or their band of merry men saw

    ReplyDelete
  110. 108, no they won't blame the Queen but they certainly could send her a begging letter to look for Maddie for them. Nothing would surprise me now.

    RE-OPEN THE CASE PORTUGAL

    WOOF WOOF

    ReplyDelete
  111. Have a look at mccann files.com interesting article from the daily star

    ReplyDelete
  112. suddenly gerrys changed from labour to tory, already priming the possible new PM. and he wants to be n MP, hardly reliable, but then can spin perfectly. It is an absolute disgrace that these two continue to manipulate all, Does Gerry lay golden eggs? Now I know why I left UK, we still have the famous book on sale here, but the principle thing they are guilty of is leaving 3infants alone in an unsecured apartment,in a strange country, and these are doctors. It is illegal to leave a child under 12yrs alone.Maddie would still be here if they had not done that,that is if she was abducted, and there is not one shred of evidence to say she was.The last I heard of the egg man was on the sgt peppers album. "I am the egg man"
    tell no lies return to portugal and answer those 48questions, but maybe the police should have held them until all were answered

    ReplyDelete
  113. Probably they didnt consider what the Government did for them as enough because the government fall short of helping them get access to the total files, neither did they stop the release of the DVD. I think that is what they kick up the fuss about.

    What else do they expect the government to do since they themselves didnt want the case to re-open. A review of something outside of UK jurisdiction is not within the remit of the HMG. They blame the government for the abyss they found themselves in - serve them right for using the government in the first place for their own agenda. If not for the high profile they created, they would not have to fear public opinion. They have created their own mental prison.

    ReplyDelete
  114. Anonymous @ 68

    This is a somewhat belated response to your post but nonetheless I hope you pick up on it.

    From what you say, it would appear that you either have inside knowledge of this case or at least a thorough understanding of the mechanics from the perspective of the law. Either way I understand your reluctance to elaborate, however it would be much appreciated if you could justify your comments with a little more detail in order to clarify your position.

    Your comments were indeed very interesting. There have been so many theories expounded over the past months that any information forthcoming that may confirm a positive outcome would be very welcome. Obviously I am not asking you to reveal your identity but if you can offer any reassurance in this case I ask that you seriously consider commenting further on this forum. I have always believed that persons either directly involved in this case or on the periphery must read such blogs as this which has led me to wonder why such persons do not post surreptitiously, if for no other reason than putting an end to the conspiracy theories.

    With thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  115. It is really unimaginable that the McCann's would not call for a complete reopening of the investigation. How do they know that Madeleine has not come to harm by one of their drinking buddies? We know that their holiday friend David Payne liked to bath the children every night. That should give them cause for concern right there. In most cases, the abductor is known to the victim. If the McCanns were really looking for their child, then they would absolutely want to do the reconstruction of the events of the day when their daughter went missing. They would jump at this possibility because therein could lie the answer to the whereabouts of their child. But no, they do not! Why? What kind of parents would not want to leave any stone unturned in order to find out what happened to their child? Instead the McCanns are repeating the same old lame phrases like "there is still a little child missing” while holding up the same lame posters with the phone numbers of their private investigators who are being sued for fraud themselves.
    The McCanns can find the finest lawyers in the country for themselves but for the second time now they have hired private investigators who are themselves in trouble with the law for fraud among other things. In short, they can only find shady characters to look for their daughter but when it comes to themselves, they have the knowhow to hire the finest and best lawyers in the country who can win them any case where money is to be made. Funny how that goes!
    However, if the McCanns think that suing everyone and their dog is equal to caring for their daughter while she is missing is absolutely insane. Where do they find the time and energy to go from lawsuit to lawsuit and then gala-wander to high profile dinners and press conferences which do nothing to ease their daughter's plight? We must not forget that Kate and Gary did not physically search for their daughter the day she went missing. Yes, that is true! What parents would not run outside and call for their missing child from the top of their lungs? The holiday apartment was not locked and Madeline could have wandered off. But no, the McCanns knew right from the start that this is not what happened to their daughter. How can parents be so sure of their judgement when the very reason their three year old daughter went missing is because they completely misjudged the situation in the first place which then lead to catastrophic consequences for their child? Where do they find the confidence to know that Madeline did not wander off while being left alone in an unlocked apartment when on the other hand they did not foresee their child’s abduction? But the McCanns know ... but I am puzzled how.
    There is one consolation for all those people who care about what happened to Madeline and who are willing to uncover every stone: Kate and Gary McCann look more and more weary. They have lost their glow which made them so photogenic in the early days after their daughter had disappeared. The missing glow has nothing to do with the fact that they have not "found" Madeline yet, but it has all to do that there are more and more people worldwide voicing their unease with the McCanns who fear that the truth will run away on them. They are scared and it shows because the time has come!

    ReplyDelete
  116. What people don't remember is how quickly a child can be snatched up. There are cases in the USA where children were taken as their parents looked away for seconds. One such story had a child playing in the back yard while her mother watched her out the kitchen window there was only one spot the mother could not see and that is where the child's kidnapper and murderer stood waiting for her to come down the slide on her swing set. For the McCanns to leave their 3 toddlers alone, unsupervised for more than 2 hours at night, in a foreign country is so negligent and yet, they have never admitted to doing anything wrong. Instead they blame the police, media, etc. They need to own up to the fact it was their negligence that caused the disappearance of their daughter.

    ReplyDelete
  117. scotlands shame google Hollie Grieg

    ReplyDelete
  118. "68"- I really do hope you are correct, I have thought often myself that maybe just maybe there just wasn't enough hard evidence to back up the dogs ect and that the police are just waiting. I hope this is true it would certainly renew my faith in the police, here in the uk . Also do you think GB dashed to their rescue prematurely only to realise they were guilty then subsequently distancing themselves as a government.

    ReplyDelete