5 February 2010

To come


McCanns versus Amaral & Freedom of Expression


52 comments:

  1. love the collage...
    a picture speaks 1000 words - you've got a novel there

    ReplyDelete
  2. My God that McCann fellow has had more than enough to say , his right to Freedom of Expression is still being allowed , hopefully he will be gagged very soon and put on trial , charged with manslaughter .

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've been wondering who this lady is : the sixth on the ultimate left column, starting from the top (white hair).

    ReplyDelete
  4. GM control freak without a conscience!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I know its not very 'politically correct' but he is an ugly bastard with a face which begs for a fist! Sorry - but I couldn't help but say it!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY TIMES I HAVE ASKED FOR JOANNA TO PLACE A PAYPAL BUTTON ON HER FORUM.

    TO PAY FOR ALL THE WORK SHE DOES. SHE WON'T ACCEPT IT JUST AS MOST TRANSLATORS THAT I KNOW ON THE FORUMS WON'T.

    WHY?

    IS IT BECAUSE THEY ARE TRYING TO 'HIDE' SOMETHING.

    NO IT IS BECAUSE THEY WANT JUSTICE FOR MADELEINE.

    IF THAT'S PAINFUL FOR SOME. SO BE IT.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Gerry has a hard cruel face, doesn't he?

    ReplyDelete
  8. That gray hair man, first photo of 6th line, is it Isabel Duarte?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Can you add one of his angry red face outside the Lisbon court when Sandra Felgueiras dared to speak when he was speaking? Pugnacious fucker.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Oh no - to wake up to this collage is too much for the faint hearted (like me). But after some deep breaths ....

    ReplyDelete
  11. When I first heard Madeleine was missing I thought Oh those poor parents, I rapidly changed my mind when I heard Gerry speak - it was ALL about them and it was then I learned that they had left the children alone night after night.

    If they want people to look for Madeleine perhaps they should lead by example and start looking for her themselves - that would be a first wouldn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Has anyone sent the collage to Gerry?
    The narcissistic prat would cherish it with orgasmic delight.
    His adored face ... so many times.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Speaking of freedom of expression, we know how the McCanns relate to books. They teared off their child's book to write down their fabricated checking timetable.

    As to the collage, only one photo is missing: the one where Gerry should be wearing a small black moustache reminding us of a sinister character that didn't like books either.

    ReplyDelete
  14. When will be the next audition in court? February 10th? Will be open to the public? Anyone has an idea about what is coming soon?

    ReplyDelete
  15. poster 5 ...join the queue !! every photo has that arrogant look which screams out "We have got away with it ,and there is nothing anyone can do to change it" God I really hate these 2 ,I have never met them (mores the pity) but I just hate everything they have done and everything they stand for

    ReplyDelete
  16. "We are all equal, but McCanns are more equal than others"

    The McCanns can spout their thesis, get it published in newspapers and heard on TV, but can Goncalo (and the PJ) do the same ?

    No way

    Thank goodness for the internet and people like Joana.

    Louise

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anon 6 - don't know why you are shouting at us (all caps is interpreted as shouting, in case you didn't know) but perhaps Joana and her colleagues are motivated by something other than money. It could be a sense of ethics and justice.

    I realise that McCann apologists will find this incomprehensible. After all this time, I do truly believe that they do not comprehend the idea that some people will work for justice and truth without any hope of personal gain. They don't get that, it is an idea from another planet to them.

    But there are people that will do so... this blog and others stand as witness to that.

    Joana, Astro and others like them keep us informed where the mainstream press has descended into sycophantic boot-licking.

    At any rate, shouting at Joana and Astro for not collecting money, not recommended. They are more noble than that.

    --Trismegistus

    ReplyDelete
  18. He is one scary man!

    Judy

    ReplyDelete
  19. 13 Fernis...

    You raise a good point. I have an absolute respect for books that leads me to keep even ones that I don't think have any merit. I cannot throw a book away... if I try it always comes back. Even religious tracts that I consider nonsense... I have trouble discarding. (OH don't worry I do eventually.) I have books on my shelf that I consider nonsense, but I can't find it my heart to throw them away. They are books, distillation of ideas. Valuable things.

    The McCanns, on the other hand, appear to have absolutely no respect for books, witness their treatment of their daughter's book and the book written by the one person that probably is putting their daughter's interests before his own. Her parents certainly aren't.

    If I were Madeleine, small and vulnerable, I would rather have Goncalo Amaral on my side than my pathetic parents. Use of reproductive organs does NOT bestow a higher level of morals and consciousness than the breeders started with.

    --Trismegistus

    ReplyDelete
  20. Moler 11. Agree. I think that's the whole point. The Mccanns betrayed people's confidence, not about something, but about a human being that has disappeared (their own child). It looks as if people who don't know Madeleine care more for her than her own parents do. This interfears with common sense, you can't imagine and have to protest in favour of human dignity. It is beyond belief they blame all of us for that, the Mccanns themselves are responsible for involving the whole world in this tragedy.

    Dutchman

    ReplyDelete
  21. @5
    I could never ever tire of punching McTwat's horrendous face.

    ReplyDelete
  22. "Leaving no stone unturned" (or stomach unchurned as one previous poster so eloquently stated)
    Thank you again Joana and your group, for keeping us up to date and for your hard work. This is the only site I would post on about this case. The interesting and informative articles and poems help to leaven the horrible subject matter we are dealing with. Many of us here have taken the above injunction literally.

    ReplyDelete
  23. @ Anonymous 8
    This lady (with white hair) isn't ID. I wondered too who she was.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Joana,
    If that is a suggestion for a desktop background, erm... thanks but no thanks!!!
    On the other hand, as a dartboard background, maybe...

    ReplyDelete
  25. I have never been very good at darts Jen 24, but I reckon with that ugly mug in front of me I could quite quickly become a world champion!

    ReplyDelete
  26. OMG! If you view that (excellent) tableau through half-closed eyes, it looks like a stained-glass window, fit for a McCathedral!

    McCannism, the new religion. (Now, where did I put that vomit emoticon?!)

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anon 6, who are you...trying to debase this site and attack Jo? This is a great site - keeping us informed and providing somewhere for us to share thoughts and know that we are not alone in hating the injustice being perpetrated by the McCanns and supported by Branson and Rowling and that horrible double glazing salesman, Kennedy!.

    ReplyDelete
  28. anonym 27, I think you didn't understood no 6...

    ReplyDelete
  29. I too think this is an excellent site,very informative,i've learnt things about this case i never knew,thanks Joana and everyone involved in it,i hope justice is seen to be done next week for Mr Amaral,then hopefully his book can be published for the world to read,then people who blindly follow the McConns every word may start to question their version of events.

    ReplyDelete
  30. No 27.

    No way am I debasing this site. I am saying, that I have suggested many times that Joanna put a paypal on here. Yet she refuses.

    I am suggesting that Joanna (and all the translators) are more honourable and wil not accept money for such work although IMO Joanna has worked harder than most for Madeleine and justice.

    Sorry if I didn't explain properly.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Will we know the verdict on the book next week or do we have to wait and are the MaCliars calling a witness next week. These two have some nerve the are shameless its the stuff you all senario prove it.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Some dogs are more appreciated than others!
    Comments welcome too.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1248979/Heroic-military-dog-honoured-Victoria-Cross.html

    ReplyDelete
  33. They dont need money to search for Maddie, they only have to demand a re opening of the case, but then that does not pay their mortgage or their trips and self publicity, or their pursuence of more money. Even if they are innocent this is no way to carry on if your distraught about your child. Money and Fame is what they enjoy, forget dear Maddie. What parent would allow the case to be shelved if they truly believed their child was alive.I would fight to the end of the earth Kate to keep the police searching for my child, but you prefer to party and brush shoulders with the not so famous anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  34. moler,your posdt made me laugh,lol

    ReplyDelete
  35. These McScammers never searched physically for poor Madeline to begin with. It is all about money and getting away with a capital crime.

    K.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Anon 30 - i think most people understood what you meant, and well said.
    Liz

    ReplyDelete
  37. 2007 Gerry Mccann: 'One good thing to come out of all of this is that there is so much in the press, nobody knows what is true, and what isn't."
    2010: One good thing to come out of all of this is that there is so little in the press, every right-minded human being (not to mention the dogs as you wish) knows what is true, and what isn't.

    I have always wondered something about the smelling of death scent on Kate's clothes and cuddlecat, due to 6 corpes. What do the family and their friends think of these deceased be used as some kind of evidence. Does anybody know?

    M. Netherlands

    ReplyDelete
  38. 37 Yes, the six corpses near Rothley that Kate claimed (or Clarence claimed for her) to have been in contact with the week previous to her holiday.
    I am also not aware of any result about this. It does not seem to have been followed up by any investigators (again, as far as we know.)
    It's yet another example of an unproved excuse -or if you prefer,another total fabrication.

    ReplyDelete
  39. 38 Thank you for answering. If this is fabrication it is revolting. If it is true I don't understand why none of the family or friends of these deceased respond op to such a statement, because if it is true, these relatives (and other people) must know if Kate Mccann was with the corpes that week. I can't imagine a relative allows that a beloved departed is used in this way.
    But as you say maybe we're not aware of the results of an investigation.

    M. Netherlands

    ReplyDelete
  40. If they had death smell on her clothes from corpses prior to the holiday, does this mean she did not wash her clothes before using them on her holiday??? but quick enough to wash cuddle cat-......
    These McCanns, Im so happy they are not my doctors, I would not let them near me, kate is under total manipulation to Gerry, who looks/sounds like a misogenist anyway.An utter control freak.

    ReplyDelete
  41. That´s a lot of dead people, in one small area in one small week.

    ReplyDelete
  42. In fact it is too many deaths in a small area in such a short time....for a GP, if it was a hospital, different but a GP and a part time one....no

    ReplyDelete
  43. poster 40,what baffles me is not only did she wear her holiday clothes to all these deaths ,she also took her daughters toy along too ?? My husband and I are not Doctors ,but even we afford all new clothes to take on our holidays ,they must think people are stupid if they think we believe this ,but the sad thing is ,some do !! thats why they are still getting away with it

    ReplyDelete
  44. poster 38 ,If my memory serves me right,it was kates Mother who first said she had been to 6 deaths

    ReplyDelete
  45. Just received my reply from the Home Office, regarding my letter to Ed Balls, querying GM's invitation to the CEOP Conference. It does nort address my query about CRB checks........
    "Mr McCann was in vited to speak at the CEOP conference on the 26th of January, to give the perspective of a parent whose child is missing. The conference was addressed by a range of speakers from both inside and outside the police and covered a range of experiences and insights in this sensitive and complex area. Mr McCann was invited to speak as a parent whose child is missing. As such he brings a particular personal perspective which is valuable for those who may have to deal with such cases to hear.
    It is not our policy to comment on specific details of police investigations. However work continues on Madeleine's disappearance, led in the UK by Leicstershire police. They are continuing to explore all possible steps for further progressing the investigation drawing on a range of UK policing resources and liaising with the Portuguese authorities, who continue to lead on the overall investigation, as appropriate. We continue to hope that Madeleine will be found safe and well.
    Yours sincerely
    Justin Millar"

    ReplyDelete
  46. Further to my posting about receipt of the Home Office letter, my comments about the delay of 5 months by LP ,in forwarding the Gaspars' statements, were not alluded to.

    ReplyDelete
  47. thank you anonymous could you send me a copy forwarded to my email, please

    ReplyDelete
  48. Dear Joana
    I will forward you a copy of my letter asap. I'm just off to work, but will post later today. If you want a hard copy, please let me know how to get it to you. Feel free to contact me on my e- mail address if that's possible for you.

    ReplyDelete
  49. thank you so much for sending that HO answer, I'm surprised to read: «However work continues on Madeleine's disappearance, led in the UK by Leicstershire police. They are continuing to explore all possible steps for further progressing the investigation drawing on a range of UK policing resources and liaising with the Portuguese authorities, who continue to lead on the overall investigation, as appropriate.», when we all know no investigation taking place, the PJ is not investigating an archived case and the LPC do not have any jurisdiction on the matter. my email is joanamorais at gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  50. Perhaps it would have been better to ask the Home Secretary to comment on the findings of the dogs in the McCanns' apartment and back of their hire car.

    These finding are in line with the conclusions of the official investigators of the death of Madeleine in the apartment.

    And why, when the findings of the best dogs in world are being accepted by the Portuguese, they appear to have been dismissed by the UK police, who are not coming out and verbally supporting these UK dogs, when the McCanns are trying to discredit them in the UK media.

    So, just who are the UK authorities supporting?

    The dogs or the McCanns?

    Because it sure does look like it is the McCanns.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Anon #50. Good point. I remember hearing on CNN that the British dogs were the best in the world.
    I wonder what this case has done to their reputation although I read they are still used by the FBI.

    ReplyDelete
  52. under the freedom of information act is it possible to get an answer to a question regarding the number of corpses there were lying around where kate worked in the week before she went on holiday

    ReplyDelete