2 May 2010

Front Line “After Maddie” - Video Reportage



Front Line “After Maddie”, a reportage by journalist Jorge Almeida
 

Three years after the disappearence of Madeleine McCann, a RTP media team returned to Praia da Luz to assess the social-economical effects of the case. After becoming world-wide famous, the small Algarvian villa plunged in a profound crisis. This reportage shows unheard statements of the Ocean Club workers, local shopkeepers and members of the English community living in the area. “After Maddie”, is a reportage of the journalist Jorge Almeida, image by Vitor Amorim, image editing by Paulo Nunes and production by Amélia Gomes Ferreira.

Linha da Frente “Depois de Maddie”, uma reportagem do jornalista Jorge Almeida

Três anos depois do desaparecimento de Madeleine McCann, uma equipa de reportagem da RTP regressou à Praia da Luz para constatar os efeitos socioeconómicos do caso. Depois de ter ficado mundialmente conhecida, a pequena vila algarvia mergulhou numa crise profunda. Esta Grande Reportagem conta com depoimentos inéditos de trabalhadoras despedidas do Ocean Club, comerciantes locais e de membros da comunidade inglesa residente na região. “Depois de Maddie”, é uma Grande Reportagem da autoria do jornalista Jorge Almeida com imagem de Vitor Amorim, edição de imagem de Paulo Nunes e produção de Amélia Gomes Ferreira.

Video time 26'11'' RTP 2010



Translation/transcript Front Line “After Maddie” – RTP 1/5/2010

Kate McCann – «Por favor devolva a nossa menina» [Please return our daughter.] [Archive Video footage May 2007]

Voice Over: Tonight, on Front Line the social economic consequences in Praia da Luz, three years after Madeleine McCann’s disappearance.

Former Ocean Club employee: «What has happened here, in that house, where I worked, that has troubled me a lot.»

English ex Pat – «Please come to the Algarve, but if you are coming as a family holiday, treat it as a family holiday and do things together. Don’t leave the kids.»

Portuguese man - «What is in the minds of people is a huge uncertainty; some say that they are convinced that it was an abduction, others say that the child was murdered inside the apartment and her cadaver was concealed.»

English ex Pat 2 - « I think that if she was still alive, I think by now, somebody would have found something about it. That’s just my opinion and my friend’s, we came to think that Madeleine is dead.»

Voice Over: In this night, at the end of April, Praia da Luz is practically deserted. Spring has not yet arrived, rain persists to fall. The strength of the pound as also weakened, but another event continues to hound this place. [Cut to church of Luz clock, showing the time 22:09] It was round about this time that Madeleine McCann disappeared.

Enters production credits and title ‘After Maddie’

Gerry McCann (reading from a script) - «Words cannot describe the anguish and despair that we are feeling, as the parents of our beautiful daughter, Madeleine. We request to anyone that may have any information related to Madeleine’s disappearance, no matter how trivial, contact the Portuguese police, and help us get her back safely. Please, if you have Madeleine, let her come home to her mummy, daddy, brother and sister». [Archive Video footage May 2007]

Voice Over: It was from one day to the other, that Madeleine McCann’s disappearance caused Praia da Luz to become worldwide renowned. For weeks, hundreds of journalists placed the small Algarvian villa at the top of the news alignment of the international TV stations.

Cut to Sky News video footage with Martin Brunt reporting live from Praia da Luz in 2008 - News anchor: «Let’s go back to Martin Brunt, our crime correspondent in Praia da Luz, where this sad story started back in May of last year.»

Voice Over: In the UK, 800 children were reported missing in the six months after Madeleine’s disappearance. Every day, hundreds of children disappear in the world, but until today only Maddie deserved such a huge magnitude from the media. Three years after, the mystery continues to be unsolved. The same difficulty appears also in establishing what was the impact in Praia da Luz after the disappearance. The events stage, the Ocean Club, suffered great financial consequences: in April 2009, 21 of the 49 workers were sacked. In 2007, the year of the disappearance, the company had 130 employees. Dora Silva was one of the cleaners who has lost her job. In the dismissal letter, there were two arguments.

Dora Silva (former Ocean Club employee) - The crisis, worldwide and in consequence of the girl’s disappearance.

Voice Over: The drama has afflicted the whole family. Her sister, who had worked for 11 years at the Ocean Club was also fired at the same time. Today, she is convinced there was an exploitation of the tragedy, since she never felt a collapse in the holiday’s bookings.

Fátima Espada (former Ocean Club employee) – I do not think so [referring to the arguments used in the dismissal letter], because we kept on working as normal, after the girls’ disappearance. We did not feel any fall down, with apartments being booked, and daily admission of clients. Then the other motive they have alleged besides the crisis, I don’t know…

Voice Over: Maria Júlia, the mother of the two sacked employees, ended up asking recently the dismissal from the Ocean Club, after 16 years of working there. It was her who cleaned for the last time the McCann family apartment, just the day before to the girls disappearance.

Maria Júlia (former Ocean Club employee) – When I went there on Wednesday [2nd May 2007], they were there. It was they who opened the door for me, they told me to get in and then they told me that they were leaving. They even told me something about the balcony… yes… I understood that they were going to the balcony, and even thought they were going to the balcony. But no, they really left. They went out from that door, that door…the door that gives access to the garden [the balcony double glazed door] and that was it, they went out, never again… It was the only time that I was with them.

Voice Over: Just like her two daughters, Maria Júlia was also heard by the Judiciary Police. Madeleine’s disappearance will accompany her for the remaining of her days. One of the main reasons to stop working [at the Ocean Club] was the fact of being psychologically distressed.

Maria Júlia - Very, very much. It was something that disturbed me a lot, because I was aggrieved, I had just lost my husband a few months before, and then that happened, in that house were I worked… and that troubled me. I had a good supervisor, the supervisor that was then there, she knew how I felt and she was very supportive for me.

Voice Over: The Ocean Club administration refused a request for an interview by RTP. In off, they explain delicately that they do not wish to revive the case and are afraid of the exploitation that the UK media might do of any statement they give.


translation/transcript continues [stopped at 7'30'']

Broadcast by RTP on Saturday, 1st May 2010 at 21:00pm


67 comments:

  1. Boa entrevista Jorge Almeida. Conseguiu desviar o foco do casal para algo também muito importante: HÁ VIDA para além do drama dos McCann qualquer que tenha sido o destino da criança.

    Intrigaram-me comentários de espanto relativamente ao excesso de publicidade que este caso conseguiu e continua a atingir junto dos media.

    Não podia estar mais de acordo com o ex detective: a sua experiência também lhe diz que a verdade virá a ser conhecida, porque a verdade tem esta característica incontrolável de conhecer a luz do dia quando menos se espera, é uma qualidade intrínseca, até pela incapacidade de alguém conseguir controlar toda a verdade, toda a informação relativa a um assunto tão pertinente dentro de uma gaveta fechada à chave.

    Concordo que conhecer a verdade não é só importante para a família é também algo que é devido a todos os britânicos e portugueses (e principais locais que viram a imagem da PDL exposta pelos piores motivos).

    Achei muito interessante o comentário do empresário inglês: o desparecimento de Madeleine é um acontecimento completamente fora do contexto para quem conhece como decorre a vida na Praia da Luz e arredores e os residentes e visitantes em geral. É um comentário que encerra um si matéria para reflexão.

    O Algarve é um destino seguro e muito querido de muitos. As famílias que viajam com os seus filhos devem assumir plenamente a sua responsabilidade parental. Os portugueses vivem a vida em família É um lugar de eleição para pais com crianças. Mas se os pais forem para os copos e deixarem as crianças sozinhas à sua sorte, os acidentes podem acontecer e têm sido imensos os relatos de casos de negligência, infelizmente.

    Sem pretender bater no ceguinho (leia-se casal McCann) é uma enorme irresponsabilidade deixar crianças pequenas sozinhas. E não é como estar no jardim de nossa casa e eles estarem no primeiro andar, porque se acontecer um acidente nós podemos ir imediatamente em seu socorro. Jantar a uns bons metros não oferece nenhuma segurança de que possamos acudi-los se nem sequer ouvimos os seus apelos. Uma vizinha ouviu a criança chorar e chamar pelos pais mais do que uma hora. Devia ter sido um sinal suficiente, um pai ou uma mãe responsável devia ter ficado sensibilizado com o susto da criança, o que terá ela sentido ao longo de uma hora sem que eles lhe acudissem. Uma criança que chora uma hora, está suada, assustada, nervosa, tem os olhos inchados e tem medo de ser novamente abandonada. É cruel voltar a repetir o abandono!

    Ser médico não é vacina contra a irresponsabilidade parental!

    Mas a responsabilidade é cívil: dos pais, dos vizinhos e do Ocean Club, e de todos nós que temos obrigação de denunciar situações de abandono e risco para a segurança das crianças.

    De um modo geral, as pessoas não acreditam que Madeleine esteja viva, contrariamente às sucessivas campanhas dos McCanne e vacilam relativamente ao que lhe terá acontecido.

    Achei interessante a maneira airosa como o Ocean Club descartou alguns empregados contemporâneos do misterioso desaparecimento e a falta de interesse de a proprietária manter o apartamento 5-A. Talvez os McCann o queiram comprar se o Fundo assim o permitir. O que acham?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Joana I noticed one of the staff members in this video..Maria Julia Silva..pretty obvious why she was sacked. Here is part of her statement May 2nd..




    . In regards to her duties directly related to the apartment, she states that the last time she entered there was on the Wednesday, the day before the facts, more precisely on the 02 of May, where she carried out cleaning. Questioned, says that contrary to what has been established, on Thursday, the 03rd, she was doing something else, and did not have the opportunity to pick up the rubbish bags;
    . She remembers that when she entered the apartment (A), on Wednesday, that inside she came across the parents. After being allowed to enter, she carried out her work, as they had already left. While she was there, she did not come across any child, supposing that they were in the crèche;
    . During the time she carried out her work, she remembers having seen, given the scenario presented, that the couple slept in the room opposite the entrance way, where she came across a children’s cot. This room gives access to an exterior garden which is called the ground floor, and to a veranda. In the room closest to the door of the apartment, there was a bed pushed to the wall (where she assumed the missing child slept) and a second cot. All these beds were ‘messy’ and this told her that they had been used. She states further that in the room closest to the door, was another bed, which was not used;


    xxxxxxx

    May 2nd Wednesday...two cots but one in each room...May 3rd both cots in same room...GNR noticed cots without bedding..

    Police also noticed there were no cots when they searched the villa ...it seems once Madeleine was gone cots were no longer required.

    Gerry Mccann in his blog said on their return from holiday the twins were going to have beds but Madeleines abduction delayed this.

    Pretty odd thing to say...

    ReplyDelete
  3. How many more victims before this case gets resolved?

    Do the McCanns care at all? They are sailing on regardless, leaving a very bad wake which drags people under as they go.

    ReplyDelete
  4. That ex British cop in the video certainly doesn't believe in the McCann's fairy tales.
    Well, that's my impression!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I feel so sorry for the people in PDL who are so worse affected by the gruesome twosome.
    How many lifes have they destroyed meanwhile?
    Above all: Madeleine's.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't know if the flats were cleaned everyday.

    The lady who use to clean mccann's flat, said that she clean the flat at last time on Wednesday and wen she went the flat, mccann's were there, with Madeleine and the twins or alone? She did not gave too much information about that. But she comment what she found strange- Mccann's said to her, they are leaving. And she did not saw them again.
    Why they said to a cleaner they are leaving? The way the lady remark it seems that for her, they are not talking about leaving the flat.
    The end of the holidays was planed to be at the weekend, if I'm not in error, then why leaving on wednesday?

    Interesting will be to know if the lady saw the Tennis blue bag in the flat when she clean-up that day and if she saw the Cuddle cat in Maddie bed.
    I always suspect the Cuddle cat. Did not look like a Teddy connected with Madeleine in the emotional way that Kate want us to believe. Look like a fabricated mascot to atract the public. Marketing to break the hearts and made public ready for donations.

    If Madeleine was abducted and if the Cuddle cat was with Madeleine when he take her, I don't believe an abductor will take the girl leaving her teddy behind, having the risk of leaving his hair or his clothes fibres sticked at the cuddle cat. He will take everything.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Poster 6...the cleaner said the Mccanns were in the apartment alone, no children present.

    Part of Kates statement May 4th

    At around 10pm, the witness came to check on the children. She went into the apartment by the side door, which was closed, but unlocked, as already said, and immediately noticed that the door to her children's bedroom was completely open, the window was also open, the shutters raised and the curtains open, while she was certain of having closed them all as she always did.

    Faced with this altered situation, she verified that the twins were in their beds, unlike Madeleine, who had disappeared. The cover was neatly pulled back and the toys were on the pillow as usual. After searching the whole apartment thoroughly, and already quite scared and unnerved, she returned to the restaurant, and alerted her husband and the rest of the group to the disappearance. The group immediately headed to the club, and set about searching in all the buildings, swimming pool, tennis courts etc... as well as in the apartment with the help of employees. At the same time, they contacted the authorities, which would later arrive.

    Later, the witness would learn that a member of the group, Russell's partner Jane, at around 9.15pm, when she went to her own apartment to check on her children, saw from behind and at a distance of about 50 metres, on the road along the club, a long-haired person, she thinks wearing jeans, with a child in his arms, walking very quickly. But she is better able to tell about that herself.


    xxxxxxxx

    TOYS on the pillow as usual...nothing about the cat or blanket...TOYS...

    Kate also claimed this weekend to Sandra the shutter had been down all week...yet here she claims she closed the windows before leaving as she ALWAYS did.

    ReplyDelete
  8. E interessante percebermos como a principal motivacao dos Mccann ao longo destes 3 anos, tem sido uma verdadeira caca as bruxas, eliminando todos os que possam causar turbulencia no seu voo replecto de mentiras.
    Comecaram por cacar os empregados do Ocean Club depois de falharem Murat. Qual foi o criterio escolhido para despedir os 21 empregados ja que dos depoimentos desta reportagem vemos que ha 3 que sao da mesma familia e uma lidava directamente com os Mccann, e outra que diz que nao foi a falta de trabalho e de reservas que justificou os despedimentos? Eram empregados incompetentes, sem trabalho ou CONHECIAM OS MCCANN, VIRAM COISAS, SABIAM COISAS E POR ISSO ERAM POTENCIALMENTE INCOMODOS E PERIGOSOS?
    A caca as bruxas continuou com a censura ao livro de Goncalo Amaral e a manipulacao do julgamento a tortura 'DUVIDOSA' de Leonor Cipriano. Nao satisfeitos, agora tentam cacar a policia portuguesa e inglesa com acusacoes insensatas. Quando acusam as policias, na pratica acusam os inspectores incomodos, que do lado portugues ja sabemos quem sao e do ingles... fica uma duvida muito grande. Nao sao os permeaveis de Leicester nem devem ser nenhuns. A jogada e toda so para descredibilizar e calar os portugueses enquanto reanimam um Fundo moribundo com a promessa de reabertura do caso. Reabertura que sabemos, voluntariamente nunca pedirao, e se forem obrigados fugirao como ja fizeram outras vezes.
    E para esta CACA AS BRUXAS que o Fundo serve e e so isso que os move e os faz voltar a Portugal. Nao estiveram disponiveis para a reconstrucao da policia nem para responder a perguntas cruciais, quando o desaparecimento estava fresco e Madeleine tinha mais hipoteses de ser recuperada com vida, se de rapto se tratasse. Estao disponiveis agora, numa cruzada mundial, com corridas contra-relogio para darem o maximo de entrevistas as TVs europeias e levarem ao mundo a imagem da Maddie lolita, em nada diferente daquelas que as policias de renome encontram criminalmente na posse de pedofilos.
    E o que fara o descredibilizado PGR Portugues? Vai engolir em seco e deixar seguir o circo porque tambem lhe convem que o caso nao seja reaberto. Se o reabrisse expunha a sua incompetencia, por ter cedido a pressoes, por ter precipitadamente arquivado o caso, em vez de seguir com inteligencia e mao de ferro, ate a verdade. Se reabrisse o caso, tinha de demitir-se no dia seguinte e la caia a mascara do Freeport, da Face Oculta, do julgamento dos Inspectores acusados trouxamente pela Cipriano e de outros casos tao mal explicados ao pais.
    E por isso que estes cacadores de bruxas nao tem problemas em incriminar-se na TV publica portuguesa, nem em usar a imagem da filha de forma tao perversa. Tem o PGR na mao e a reabertura do caso e CONVERSA DA TRETA para atirar poeira para os olhos do publico que nao desiste da verdade e os critica em todo o lado onde isso e possivel.
    Mas como diz o ex-inspector ingles, A VERDADE VIRA AO DE CIMA. Eles ja nao enganam mais ninguem. E das entre-linhas dos ingleses residentes na PDL, saem muitas verdades: O caso e pouco usual, pouco provavel ( entenda-se o rapto), o Algarve e seguro, e e conviccao deles e dos amigos que Madeleine esta morta e algo passou pela cabeca de um 'louco' que lhe fez mal. Ao contrario dos pais que acham que nada de mal lhe aconteceu ( perverso como os pais de uma crianca que dizem raptada, acham que nao lhe aconteceu mal), Os ingleses residentes acham que lhe aconteceu muito mal.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The Cuddle Cat look like a Kate fabrication.

    Abductors don't leave evidences behind and the Cuddle cat, if close to Madeleine, had a potential risk of holding evidences against the abductor.

    A caring abductor will carry Madeleine with Cuddle cat to avoid more disturbances in the girl and calm her.

    A crazy abductor will carry Madeleine with Cuddle cat and if he get struggled with girl, he will destroy her and her belongs on one GO.

    ReplyDelete
  10. What false unshed tears by Kate McCann in that video. When I first saw that I knew they were hiding something and were not genuinely grief stricken.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I can remember very clearly Kate saying it was because Cuddlecat was on the shelf she knew Madeleine had been taken.

    I think it was on TV (news?).

    Since then the story has changed with the telling.

    ReplyDelete
  12. WARNING

    Joana I log on to your account every morning. This morning this site attempted to download an infacted file which my virus checker picked up. It was masquerading as a Windows file update.
    Thank you and Astro for your sterling work while the McCann's continue to insult the intelligence of every intelligent person on the planet.
    May they eventually be brought to justice

    ReplyDelete
  13. anonymous 11, good morning (to all as well)it appears that a pop-up advert is appearing when opening a post page, I'm going to check on blogger help groups if there are other similar cases. Meanwhile, the only solution I've found is to clear the browser cache and cookies - see here How to do that for Firefox and Internet Explorer http://www.google.com/support/accounts/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=32050 - and then if you have a pop up blocker, when you see a message just bellow the address bar asking for you to allow the pop-up ad, just close it or choose to not allow any pop-ups. Since I don't use any kind of adverts in this blog template, it must be something that was injected, perhaps a trojan, either in a javascript which I use for several blogger functions and gadgets, the difficulty now is to understand which Javascript is the one affected by this problem. Thank you for the warning.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Joana and poster 11 - I had the same problem, and the avast! virus scanner (free version) got rid of it. Any of the reputable virus protection programs should do the same.

    --Trismegistus

    ReplyDelete
  15. All right, just found out that it is a common problem, it appears to be something related with the use of certain google/blogger gadgets, I'm reading here what I can do to solve this situation http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2010/03/identifying-and-removing-html.html and here http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/blogger/thread?tid=21ac5e7be1041ce5&hl=en.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hello Joana, thanks for your sterling work!
    The video looks very interesting, patiently waiting till you will have time to translate it further.

    Today is the day to remember Madeleine McCann, the little angel who deserved so much more!

    TTS

    ReplyDelete
  17. Finally, just found the culprit for the pop-up ad, last week I installed a x number of Views per-post javascript [http://nirav07.ulmb.com/counter.php] it seems that the counter was hacked and is now forcing a pop-up advert - removing that script and hopefully all will be fine. Then I'll continue with the translation of the above video. Thanks for your patience.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Where is the Portuguese journalist with b.... to ask the Attorney General, if Mccann's already fill the form to reopen the case or if he intend to reopen the case after the last campaign and after what Kate said in first person to RTP?

    ReplyDelete
  19. I invite the PGR to show the world the evidences the investigation have, supporting Kate claims about the shutter of the window being open by the abductor. No way that he open it without leaving traces.

    If there is no evidences to support that claim ( which I strongly believe) then the case should be reopened and the Mccann's forced to explain in court why they lie. Or they lie to the police on their first statements or Kate lie for RTP now. They cannot have it both ways. Whatever was the case, there is an agenda behind it and this agenda have nothing to do with search of Madeleine and with her safe return.
    Gerry confessed that he feel that they are far away from knowing where Maddie is and who take her. Then, they have strong clues and new leads or they are faraway, which means no clues and no leads? WHICH GAME ARE THEY PLAYING WITH ALL THIS MEDIA INTERVIEWS AND THE PUBLIC?
    This are evidences which the PGR can't ignore. They crossed the world, exposed in first person without the intimidation and the pressures of polices. Wonder how many investigations were reopened with less evidences.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I have always found it odd the claim that the window in the children bedroom was never opened! Shutters down all day?! In sunny Algarve? Why would anyone choose to turn on the lights during the day to do a number of things (dressing the kids, etc.)when there was plenty of light and sunshine outside?! And around late April/early May there is sunlight until late, at least till around 8pm, so, the chuildren could have been prepared to go to bed withoput the need of turning the lights on.
    From Kate's statement (posted by Ironside at #7) we obviously see that Kate is lying about this (just one more inconsistency among many), and also because the police found Kate's fingerprints on the window, in a position that indicated a opening motion. I think this is why she now tries to pass the idea that they/she never touched the window, to distract and confuse people.
    Also another thing that has always puzzled me and that I never read any explanation about it is, if she found the window open at 10pm and she ran back to the Tapas and left it open, who closed it afterwards? Who closed the window? Because it was closed when the GNR arrived! Someone had to close it, and whoever it was managed to do it without leaving any traces...just Kate's fingerprints to be found...

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anon @ 20

    This is part of witness statement from Silva Batista

    The deponent further recalls that she entered the room where Madeleine had been sleeping. She now remembers that the door was closed. The inside of the room was dark. The shutters were down, and light entered only through its holes. The windows were closed and the curtains slightly open. Gerry, who accompanied the deponent during this visit, with the GNR officers also present, said that it had been him who had closed the window because the babies were still sleeping inside, which the deponent could verify as true. Gerry mentioned that when he noticed that Madeleine was missing, he had found the window and shutters open, and the curtains fluttering.

    -----

    No one, but no one..witnessed the window open...it was just another lie.

    ReplyDelete
  22. @ 20

    In one of Gerry's statements he says, after returning from the tapas bar on the night of the 3rd when Kate raised the alarm he was surprised how easily the shutter rolled up, strange how only Kate's prints are on the shutter.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Obfuscation is the name of the game with this lot!

    ReplyDelete
  24. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMHXy3z5Z2E

    Strange how the Mccanns never mention the reward

    ReplyDelete
  25. @ anon 21.
    If Gerry had closed the window why were the only marks found anywhere on it kate's fingerprints?.
    Lies lies and more lies.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @22

    Her prints were recovered from the window, I believe

    ReplyDelete
  27. Of course the very basic error the McCanns have made is in Kates words...she says she walked back to the apartment to check the children, yet when the door to the bedroom was open more than it had been when 'they' had left (an odd statement in itself as Gerry claimed to have had his 'proud father' moment in the room) she hadnt intended to actually check the children, as she went to close the door!

    Surely these inconsistant statments, repeatedly made, ae noticed by the authorities? I knwo the press dont seem to notice, but we know they are being threatended and want news, not justice.

    But the authorities should notice and should act.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Car crime UK on ITV 4...dogs being used...the police trust these animals! The dog 'Copper' has a great success..Tervor Macdonald obviously does not doubt the dogs!

    Why then are the dogs who found evidence on the McCanns not trusted? How can McCann so easily dismiss these animals?

    The McCanns, by dismissing the dogs, are behaving very oddly. normal parents would be horrified and would want this pursused.

    There is little doubt that the McCanns are no innocents!

    If I had enough money I'd invest it into investigaing this case properly not chasing dismissed 'sightings'. Anyone with any sense can see the McCanns avoiding real investigation - very revealing!

    ReplyDelete
  29. How were the comments on British papers, regarding Maddie last campaign?
    Have Gamble reacted against the campaign? How can he drive an organization devoted to save and protect childs and fade in silence now?

    And Brown and Cameron? They agree with way Mccann's are using and exploring Madeleine image and tragedy? Few days ago, Brown recieved huge complaints against a Primark 7 years old paded bikini. He reacted, people reacted and Primark was forced to remove the bikini from his stores. The argument was- It is very danger for a child when they act like adults. Childs need to be protected from the adult world for their own safety and health grow.

    It is largely known that most of the victims of rape, were raped because in some way they attract or provoc the rapist. Even if it was an inconscient provocation.
    Dressing a child with adult icons is a big step to put her at the risk of the perverted paedophiles. To comemorate Maddie third missing aniversary, Mccann's have done that step and the authorities.... playing the convenient blind game, say nothing.
    Isabel Duarte, who claimed being chocked with some pictures she saw at Portimao Pj office, is chocked now that the pictures came directly from her clients? The money she earn from Mccann's did not justify everything. If she have some dignity, she must call the media to a press conference and announce that in Portugal, she no longer defend the Mccann's. Is a shame if she did not do that and the portuguese should take important conclusions about her caracter. If it was me, I will make a clear barriere between me and that parents who use their girl in such disgusting way.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Thank you for your answer #21 ( from #20). I read most of the witness statements a long time ago and did not remember that one. So Gerry said he closed the window...the very same window they decided to tell the police was open and was surelly the
    "abductor's" way out( or in), and yet, despite that window being a potential source of criminal and forensic evidence he closes it anyway!
    In the heath of the moment hey made a big mistake, they forgot to open the window, or didn't get the chance to do it, too many people came to the apartment immediately after the alarm, they had no choice but to tell the police Gerry had closed it because of the twins, who were still asleep in the room. You're so right, that window was never open, not one witness other than Kate and Gerry ever came forward confirming it was indeed open. Not even Jane Tanner, who passed closely by the window on her way to her flat AFTER she spotted the "abductor" (the window had to be open by then, if one is to follow the McCann version of the abductor leaving through the window) and never mentioned seeing an open window.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Oldfield(?) who excuse himself with his daughter been sick (vomiting) to justify the time he spend out of the table, did not notice the window open.
    On her fairy tale, Kate gave us an invisible abductor and the most fastest man in the world- He had time to hide himself and the girl, jump over the cots with two babies sleeping on them and carrying a 3 years old. Open shutters, tide the bed, put the cuddle cat in a high shelve and walk inside the flat and on the street with the shoes that Tanner described to the police. Only this shoes, I believe, on the tiles and in the street will make a lot of noise. Imagine when the weight and the discomfort of the abductor increase with a child carried on such difficult position. The abductor did not leave his shoes behind and no footprints from him were found.
    The all group lie about everything. For me, Oldfield was the guy who help Gerry conceal the body (both have been out of the table more or less at same time). He claim that his child vomit and he have to change the bed. He did not ask a spare bed sheet and a search done by the police in the flat did not found any evidence of the bed sheet with vomit.
    At time was reported, in some news, that Oldfield was accused in court about medical negligence and Gerry is his witness.
    During this 3 years, Gerry showed already what he can do to frame people if he is in troubles. Oldfield could be the first one who they frame to get him involved. Oldfield also know the Algarve and was reported that he his a friend of some people who use to do water sports (surf) there.
    The jogging and the behaviour of Mccann's after May 3, reveal that they know better the Algarve and the outskirts of PDL then what they claim, and they know more people then what they said to the police. This must come from the Tapas 7, who use to come to Algarve.

    And we should not forgot the question Oprah pose to Kate, about Madeleine blanket. Kate said, the abductor take the child and the blanket. The blanket was recorded in GNR pictures, when they took pictures of the crime scene, and disappear before PJ take the case ( That means during the night from day 3 to day 4 and when Madeleine was already missing).
    Adding all this, what we have coming directly from Kate mouth:
    - The Cuddle cat in a high shelve and deposited there by the abductor, without traces.
    - The shutters open by the abductor without traces
    - The abductor entering two times the flat. the first time to pick the girl and the second time ( after GNR) to pick the blanket. Again no traces and this time, completely invisible if we think about the amount of people which are already out looking for Madeleine.
    If there is no traces of a strange in the crime scene then the abductor must be one of them with help of Kate to disturb the place. She seems to be a good actress. The way that she explored the Cuddle cat emotional effect, the bracelets, the tears, the smiles, etc.
    She even invite the Media to show her giving sausages with sweet beans to the twins, reading stories and playing with toys with them. Something that all parents do on daily base. They have to call the world to show it as a big event. Disgusting.
    SO MANY LIES. I hope, she continue giving interviews outside UK, because they become amazing. We can set the puzzle. we and the police, already know the missing pieces.
    ONLY THE PGR WITH HIS INCOMPETENCE CAN ALLOW THIS CIRCUS TO GO FARTHER.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I am so, so angry with the Poruguese.
    How can they not reopen the case in light of the inconsistencies in so many statements!!

    ReplyDelete
  33. Does The Queen know Her Majesty's Government is keeping information about the McCann case hidden away because it would seriously damage relations between Portugal and the UK?

    After all, this is an attempt to divert a diplomatic crisis, and The Queen is the ultimate diplomat as far as the UK is concerned.

    In this day and age, with hackers and whistleblowers around, how easy for any so called 'secret' information to break forth and cause terrible scandal and embarrassment which The Queen may be dragged into.

    It is a disgrace that information which may throw light on this criminal case is being kept from investigators and the Portuguese Government.

    Who is the person who is really behind the authorisation of this?

    When the information comes out, as it no doubt will, are they going to be held accountable for this decision?

    Why is the protection of this information so necessary?

    Is it the McCanns themselves who are being protected?

    Would Her Majesty have ever given permission to hide the information away from Portugal?

    I very much doubt it. I very much doubt she has been told, but she should be, as this is being done in her name.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Sorry, at my last post (31) I mention Oldfield instead of O'Brien ( Jane Tanner partner). Was O'Brien.

    'Dr Russell O'Brien, partner of Jane Tanner, left the dining table for a long period during the night of May 3rd. This period has been reported as being anything between 25 and 45 minutes.

    It has been stated that this was to attend to his young daughter who had been vomitting and that he needed to change the sheets. Staff at the Mark Warner Ocean Club have been reported as denying that there was ever any request to wash sheets from their apartment.

    He is also one of the three Tapas group (with Rachael Oldfield and Dr Fiona Payne) who were recalled by the Portugese police to clear up queries in their statements and 'confront' Robert Murat.

    Dr O'Brien lived in Leicestershire, near the McCanns, before moving to set up home in Exeter with his partner Jane Tanner. He works at the Peninsula Medical School at the University of Plymouth's Exeter campus.

    He was widely reported to be the other Tapas group member who allegedly wished to amend their original statement.

    When contacted by Portuguese newspaper, Sol, he is reported to react with surprise but said:

    "We drank. We were on holidays. So what?"

    "It is normal that we are suspects, and the DNA test is a consequence thereof. We were the closest people involved."

    "I have nothing further to tell you. I am not going to dishonour the compromise I assumed with Kate and Gerry. They want to control all information that is disclosed."

    *
    Note: The word 'compromise' attributed to Russell O'Brien appears to be a mis-translation of the Portuguese word 'compromisso', which also means 'promise''
    From Mccannfiles

    ON THE ABOVE CONTEXT 'promise' AND 'Compromise' have more or less the same mean.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Nothing damage more the relations between Portugal and UK then this innuendo and the incompetence of portuguese PGR to deal with all crimes involving the two countries.

    People, stop feeding the Fund account and you will see how quickly the truth will come out. What is helping the Mccann's are the millions of pounds and euros in the Fund. With all this money they can pay well connected lawyers and Mitchell. This lawyers and Mitchell are the pivots and the engines of all Pro-Media campaigns and all VIP dinners and Runs.
    This lawyers work for money, not for the beautiful eyes of the Mccann's and they have that philosophy that even the 'MOST EVIL CRIMINOUS' have the right to be legal defended.
    Stop the money in the Fund and you will see all this lawyers and pink mans running out of the case and dropping the Mccann's. You will see all the Media editors changing their headlines and exposing the truth. A kind of Susan Boyle phenomena but on the other way.
    There is no real friendship at the powerful positions. All the relationships were based on conveniences and money.
    This is what is worrying Kate and Gerry- ONE DAY THE FUND WILL DRY but what is recorded in the police files, the evidences the police have and everything they said in Media interviews, NEVER DRY, NEVER GO AWAY and at the end they will face justice. PORTUGAL DID NOT GIVE UP.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Anon 34

    Thanks for pointing that out.

    So the McCanns were controlling the other Tapas friends from the get go.

    ReplyDelete
  37. On reading Jane Tanner's statement it becomes clear that Payne and O'Brien were very close.

    Is O'Brien afraid he may be dragged into the paedophile question surrounding the Madeleine case as injected by the Drs. Gaspars?

    Interesting that O'Brien mentions a DNA test.

    Were the doctors trusted to do these DNA tests on themselves, or were they done by an independent person who really knew they were taking tests from the right person.

    If they were done by the doctors themselves they should be redone independently to make sure the samples really are from the people they are supposed to be from.

    How easy it is to substitute somebody else's DNA as ones own unless care is taken to make sure this doesn't happen.

    This happened in a rape and murder case in the UK when a man got his friend to take the test on his behalf, and managed to escape capture for some time.

    ReplyDelete
  38. 'In loving memory of Madeleine McCann: this is how we'd like to remember her and NO MORE HARM can possibly come to her.' That is the message sent by the latest photos released. Frankly, for days I was left speechless. If this can be done to a missing child, what's to become of the remaining two? Are Child Protection Services not concerned? Is this not Child Endangerment?

    IMO, they know exactly what they're doing and just when and how her fate was sealed. The UK's "Independent" newspaper has picked up on it and so has Mark Williams-Thomas. And, I'm pretty sure, so have the Police.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Anon @ 35 you are correct when you state people should stop giving to the fund. The fraudulent fund is pivital in this case without it the Mccanns would not be able to afford such PR people and would be exposed for the liars they are.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Cuddle cat on a high shelf - KM A LIE
    Windows open and wind blowing the curtains - KM A LIE
    Shutters jemmied open - KM and GM A LIE
    Gerry seeing Madeleine on the bed but not covered up with bed clothes - GM A LIE
    -----Tanner says it was a cold night, which is why she thought bundleman was a bad father carrying a child with no slippers. She was wearing her husbands jumper to keep warm, remember.
    Door open more than "when we had left it". KM Possibly NOT a lie. Possibly the truth, but revealing that there were no visits in between.
    SO.. all the stories about half hour visits - LIES, proved as such by Kate
    And so on.
    Almost nothing that was said that first night was the truth.
    Why not ?

    ReplyDelete
  41. Mccann's admitted to RTP ( Sandra Felgueiras) that the twins could be sedated, this is why they did not wake-up.

    Remember Kate Mother said to British newspaper on May 2007 that Madeleine was shy and she never go with a strange without screaming.

    Remember, Kate and Gerry always refused the idea of the sedatives, always accused the police saying they fabricate the story. Gerry even got very angry at spannish TV Telecinco when the journalist pose the question. NOW THAT AMARAL WAS GAGGED AND THE BOOK SILENCED, THEY ASSUMED THE SEDATIVES, By an abductor off-course.
    We know how this work- The lawyers they know that they cannot dismiss the evidences the police have, then is time to assume them and connect them to the abductor.

    The problem is, by assuming this, they incriminate themselves again. Sandra Felgueiras clearly ask them if they noticed on the night Maddie disapear the strange behaviour of the twins, and they said YES.
    Good parents... they noticed and they refused the tests proposed by PJ in hospital. I just understand that refuse if they know what sedate the twins. FOR 3 YEARS THEY REFUSED ANY POSSIBILITY OF THE TWINS BEING SEDATED AND NOW THEY ASSUME THAT THEY NOTICED THIS ON THE SAME NIGHT AS THE POLICE? FOR 3 YEARS THEY LIE IN FRONT OF ALL MEDIA CAMERAS. This is an evidence more to accuse them of perverting and manipulating the investigation.
    First they neglected their childs and after they refuse to help the police in the investigation, damaging the search of their girl. IS THIS NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCES TO REOPEN THE CASE, MR. PGR? I believe thousand of cases were reopen for less.

    ReplyDelete
  42. anonymous 32
    I agree with you, why are they not reopening this case with all the publicity continuing to try to persuade us of new leads and abductions.
    Mr & Mrs Mccann, you came to Portugal with a new lead, to ask for the case to be reopened, did you do that??? No of course you didnt, silly me.
    Please can someone get this case reopened and put goncarlo in charge

    ReplyDelete
  43. Not sure where to put this as I don't see an entry on it. The Las Mananas de Cuatro interviews, second video on mccannfiles http://www.mccannfiles.com/id322.html (hope OK to link) at about 12.20 Gerry says, according to Google Translate:

    GM: You have to identify that person, whoever has taken Madeleine is out there, then there are other children at risk How can we participate in his "kidnapping"? We have no vehicle or anything. The lies that the media turned to give an impression that we were guilty was particularly difficult, but not as difficult as the night *she disappeared*.

    Only he doesn't say that. He says "not as difficult as the night we found her". Now unless they've cut the word 'missing' from the end, that is a monumental slip.

    Christina

    ReplyDelete
  44. Sorry, to add it was a translation by Mercedes that I Google Translated, from the transcript on mccanfiles under the video. Just to be clear.

    Maybe a word is missed off, but listening under the Spanish 'dub', there doesn't appear to be. Wondered if anyone else has seen this or knows more about it.

    Thanks
    Christina

    ReplyDelete
  45. # 43,44

    Yes, you're right, Christina. As the video is presented, he does say 'it wasn't as bad as the night we found her'.

    Some people will no doubt argue that a word, such as 'gone' or 'missing', has been chopped off the end. But, that isn't suggested by the tone and pace of Gerry's voice, which indicates to me, anyway - by the way the tone drops at that precise point - that 'her' is the final word of that sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Kate said to Sandra Felgueiras that she still not able to go to the beach. Why?
    I believe was not because of the memories of Madeleine. She was damped in the creche everyday, then few memories of her playing at the sands or the waves.

    Which memories (Bad memories) the beach, any beach, activate on Kate? The sea, could be the clue with some secrets.
    She went to PDL last time and in front of the sea she said she feel close to Madeleine there.

    ReplyDelete
  47. @ Christina - post 43 and 44.

    GOOD GRIEF! You are right! You have to listen, VERY Carefully; but at around 12.29 GM DEFINITELY SAYS:

    "THE NIGHT WE FOUND HER!".

    May the truth one day be known.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Christina - you've nailed it!

    ReplyDelete
  49. Just a little comment to 40 and others.Kate mentions Cuddle Cat being found on a shelf/the shelf as one proof of the abduction of Madeleine -as if the kindly abductor had left it behind.
    But in the photos of the children's bedroom there is no shelf.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Anon 46

    So where was Kate then when Gerry went off to the beach with the suitcase and spade a couple of days after Madeleine went missing?

    Didn't she go with him?

    Unfortunately the photo of this event has gone missing and is no longer available, unless somebody knows how to get to see it again.

    ReplyDelete
  51. If Madeleine died earlier and the abduction scenario was pre planned from before the McCanns went to the Tapas, then that could explain why the twins did not wake up with all the commotion going on.

    They would need to have been sedated, because if either or both of them had woken up when Madeleine was being removed it could really have thrown a spanner in the works.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Thanks Nige

    Yes, (my bad!) he did say "bad" not "difficult".

    I couldn't believe my ears when I heard that. I listened to it over and over. It really sticks out at the end of the interview. IF a word or two has been lost in the edit, then the uncut film should reflect that, surely? I tend to agree with you, it sounds like a natural end to a complete sentence. Oh dear.

    I posted on Mercedes blog, but my Spanish is so cack, and I had to use Google Translate for a lot of it. I now must go back and translate about 30 posts so I can reply - they are lovely over there so it would be rude not to! I should learn properly.

    Do you mind if I carry over your post/opinion? Many thanks for responding, and in advance for permission or not.

    Christina

    ReplyDelete
  53. If the McCanns keep pushing the Portuguese and UK investigators with their put downs of their investigation of the case, they may find themselves wishing they had let well alone.

    The investigators believe Madeleine is dead, and one of the lead investigators has already said they have 'stand alone evidence', and I doubt he is referring to the dogs on that, because we already knew about them.

    I have an idea what it might be, and surely if others have been following this case closely they must also have an idea what he might have been referring to.

    Even, perhaps, the McCanns also think they know. Though they don't know for sure. Just like we don't.

    Is that why they so desparetely want to get hold of those not yet released Files?

    Is it also why they so desparetely don't want the case reopened. At least, they only want it reopened if they can be pulling the strings from the back with their dead end leads, runarounds, and leads with pointers to various 'suspects'.

    Though the investigators know Madeliene is dead, they don't know for sure how she died.

    That is why they want to find her body.

    No way have they definitely concluded that Madeleine died by accident. That was only a suggestion of what she may have died from.

    The hiding of the body could indicate something far more sinister happened to her other than an accident.

    Indeed, the McCanns may wish they had let well alone because the case can end up reopened in the blink of an eye, and not on their terms either.

    Will Clarence be available for comment then?

    ReplyDelete
  54. Oh my...oh my...oh my...oh my..."THE NIGHT WE FOUND HER" as clear as a cloudless day and very much the end of the sentence - no pause for breath, no stutter, no stammer just a FULL STOP.

    #47 - I believe the truth is NOW known (and very much as Snr Amaral has suspected all along).

    May justice be done.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Anon 49

    There is a shelf in the living room of the holiday apartment which Oldfield mentions in his statement when he said he went to check the McCann children.

    He says he was looking at the books on the shelf, but makes no mention of seeing Cuddlecat there at about 9.30pm.

    This was after Jane Tanner's supposed sighting of the abductor and Gerry at the same time of about 9.10pm.

    If Kate was to continue saying Cuddlecat on the shelf alerted her to Madeleine being abducted, presumably put there by the abductor, then bang goes Gerry's alibi at 9.10pm because the toy must have been put there after 9.30pm and after Oldfield's visit.

    No wonder Cuddlecat ended up back on the bed.

    Cuddlecat on the bed means that Gerry gets his alibi back, courtesy of Jane Tanner and that supposed sighting of hers.

    ReplyDelete
  56. I tried to find the interview you are talking about and I cannot find the one where to hear those words at 12.20, please someone can give me an exact link to that ?
    Thank you very much.
    Lily form Germany

    ReplyDelete
  57. @31 + @ 34
    Maybe was not O'Brien daughter that was been vomiting maybe was other little girl that was sick and vomiting after a huge fall and after beating with her head. Vomit is one side effect of a fall..or a strong sedative..it it truth that police found something that took them considering seriously sedatives? ... who would leave a child sick vomiting in a room alone? No one... the layer was betrayed by his own brain. He should not ever talk about this. Vomiting has happened but in other context.
    The point here is, if was an accident why hiding the body... this is the main point!!!!!! What's behind the accident? Too many brains have decided to hide the truth...why? Because they all believe that the accident may be related with negligence... murder? How? The way that happened? Not being immediately rescue? Why not? Was she already alone? What would reveal an autopsy that worth hiding the truth? Other very important question: when was the last time Madeleine was seen in public? The right hour? By who? By credible witness (Payne doesn't count!).
    Is there any charge on a police file against any one of the Tapas group, or are they all clean? Anybody knows? Who are the Gaspars?
    Other important issue, future will bring us the answer: will Murat complain against Tanner stand until the end... or will they find and extra agreement out of the court? The answer to this question will tells us a lot about this drama. Robert Murat maintains a very low profile for a person who was innocently framed, don't you think?
    There is tree parts that has received a huge amount of money as a compensation for this mess: McCanns... Tapas friends... Robert Murat... I wonder if the money got in the FUND from the front door ans was given to those three groups by the exit door using the English media.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Anon 53
    I agree. All very intriguing.
    In my view the McCanns are trapped.
    They cannot stop pushing, or the fund will dry up, Carter-Ruck might start to look at the evidence, other people in the press will start to ask the questions they should have been asking all along, the Leicester Police might even think again about what they did and why they did it.
    So they have to keep going, and that means pushing ever harder to keep it all in the public eye.
    But that brings wth it the very great danger, for them, of the truth actualy coming out.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Lily from Germany:-

    http://www.mccannfiles.com/id322.html

    Second programme - Tues 4th May 2010 @ approx 12.20

    Listen to the English and negate the voice-over.

    Hope this helps x

    ReplyDelete
  60. Are Goncalo Amaral and Ricardo Paiva still being called as witnesses in the Murat- Tanner secret hearing?

    ReplyDelete
  61. @ 50 photo whooshed but the Times report of GM with the suitcase and spade is still here http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1752277.ece

    ReplyDelete
  62. OMG everytime I see that clip of the very first interview where Gerry is asking for help with their Daughter watch Kate everything Gerry says Kate she is shaking her head as if she is saying NO to the stuff he is saying becuase imo she knows its rubbush and that Maddy is gone forever.

    I remember a body language expert speaking about the Sharon Matthews case were she was shaking her head NO when she was lying about stuff she was telling you about, by shaking her head she was actually informing us that SHE was lying through her teeth.

    This is what liars do supposedly

    ReplyDelete
  63. Louise H at 61

    Thanks for that information.

    Although the suitcase photo is missing, it is still an interesting read, especially as it says Gerry McCann did a check on the children at 9.30pm.

    This timing is confirmed by statements from two people who worked at the Tapas restaurant who said Gerry was gone for half an hour from 9.30pm to 10pm, and Kate left the restaurant upon his return.

    This time also coincides with the Smith sighting of the Gerry McCann lookalike carrying the child to the beach area, yet Gerry McCann does not mention another visit to the apartment after the check at about 9.05pm, and his gazing upon Madeleine and meeting Wilkins.

    Jane Tanner was also supposed to have seen the 'abductor' dashing off into the night with Madeleine at the earlier time, thereby giving an alibi to Gerry and to her partner O'Brien.

    As regards the 'falling apart' of the McCanns whenever they saw Madeleine's face TV, if that is so, then how could they walk around PDL like they did, standing looking at photos of her and not cracking up there also.

    Do they have the ability to maintain total self control in public or are they just good actors?

    I hope others will read this article again because it is worth being reminded of what was being printed about this case at the beginning.

    As to why Gerry McCann was heading off to the beach with a suitcase and bucket and spade, this has never been explained.

    Also, was he ever seen returning from the beach with the suitcase?

    Why would he need a suitcase on the beach?

    ReplyDelete
  64. Can I just add a caution against manipulation.

    There has been talk from the outset that whatever happened to Madeleine was due to an accident, but recently people have not been buying this explanation so much.

    The McCanns know that every word they utter is listened to and analysed.

    The alternative to an 'accident' having happened to Madeleine is something far worse, including possibly paedophile involvment which has been hinted at from the Gaspar statements.

    The possibility of murder also cannot be excluded, yet a little word dropped here and there and the ''accident' while the McCanns were absent' is back on the cards.

    The McCanns know their abduction scenario is not being bought by the police, therefore for whoever is responsible for the death of Madeleine the 'accident theory' is definitely the best of the reasons put forward for the death of Madeleine.

    Please BEWARE, the McCanns think many steps ahead of the rest who are following this case, and people have been running hither and yon following a load of false leads.

    Whatever the McCanns do is done for a reason, have we not realised that yet.

    An 'accident' will be overlooked by the authorities, murder or manslaughter wont.

    Don't be so willing to discard these alternatives for what appears to be a missing word from the lips of Gerry McCann. The McCanns are not stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Anon 63: "As to why Gerry McCann was heading off to the beach with a suitcase and bucket and spade, this has never been explained.

    Also, was he ever seen returning from the beach with the suitcase?

    Why would he need a suitcase on the beach?"

    And if there was an inocent explanation for this, why has the photo been withdrawn? I can distinctly remember it!

    ReplyDelete
  66. Anon 65

    For those who have never seen the photo, nor are likely to if all the photos have been removed, could you please describe what kind of suitcase it was.

    Was it being wheeled, or carried? What colour was it? Can you remember these details?

    ReplyDelete
  67. Mas que categoria de documentario, Joana. Muito e muito obrigado.
    What what quality documentary, Joana. Many, many thanks.
    In particular what the ex-pats (immigrates ingleses) say aobut Portugal and about the Portuguese. Absolutely brilliant !!

    ReplyDelete