4 March 2013

Leonor Cipriano court started today, for making false statements against Judiciary Police officers


Leonor Cipriano false appeal

Leonor Cipriano trial starts today at Faro. The woman is accused for having allegedly made ​​false statements, when she complained that she had been assaulted by Judiciary Police officers.

Some officers [in the previous trial] were acquitted, and the Court concluded then that Leonor Cipriano had lied. The trial starts in the afternoon, at 14.00, at the criminal court of first instance in Faro.

in Sic Notícias, 4 March 2013

In 2009: Court states that Leonor Cipriano lied

The Court of Faro will request the Public Ministry to open a judicial inquiry on Leonor Cipriano over the crime of false statements in the trial of present and former PJ inspectors within the “Joana case”.

In the ruling, that was read out on Friday and which the Lusa Agency accessed today, the collective of judges considered that the statements that Leonor Cipriano produced during the trial sessions contained “flagrant and relevant contradictions”, and therefore determined that a certificate should be extracted, to which a copy of the tape recordings was added.

In the verdict, it is mentioned that the mother of the child that disappeared on the 12th of September 2004, in the village of Figueira, in Portimão, “was offered (…) an extensive opportunity to reveal the truth” during the trial sessions at the Court of Faro, but “essentially seized the opportunity to lie”.

“Leonor Cipriano lied about the manner in which she was beaten, about the identification of the persons that beat her, about the time and the manner how she revealed that she had been beaten, in short, she lied about every essential aspect of the statements that she gave”, the verdict stresses.

Underlining that Leonor Cipriano presented “no plausible reason whatsoever to have done so”, the collective of three judges, presided by Henrique Pavão, considered that Joana’s mother revealed “major contradictions” and that she presented “very different versions for one and the same fact”.

The verdict, which will also be sent to the PJ’s Department of Discipline and Inspection, where an inquiry is being held against present inspectors António Cardoso and Paulo Marques Bom, considered the aggressions as proved, although without establishing the aggressors’ identity, and determined the condemnation of two of the five arguidos in the process.

Gonçalo Amaral, a former coordinator of the PJ’s Criminal Investigation Department in Portimão, who was acquitted of the crime of omission of denunciation, was condemned to one and a half years over the crime of false deposition, with a suspended sentence over a similar period.

Inspector António Nunes Cardoso, who is still in service, was condemned to two years and three months over forgery of document, with a suspended sentence over two years.

Former PJ inspectors Paulo Pereira Cristóvão and Leonel Morgado Marques and still inspector Paulo Marques Bom, who all stood accused of the crimes of torture against Leonor Cipriano, following the questioning at the PJ in Faro, in 2004, were acquitted.

Leonor Cipriano and her brother, João Cipriano, were condemned by the Supreme Court of Justice to 16 years in prison each, over the crimes of homicide and concealment of Joana’s cadaver.

in Diário de Notícias, 25.05.2009

Also Related
Cipriano Case: Leonor Cipriano Confessed the Murder of the daughter Joana
«Leonor Confessed the crime on the 13th of October and she alleges she was beaten a day later. Leonor Cipriano, the killer meanwhile condemned, confessed all of this facts to the PJ on the 13th of October 2004, in the presence of her lawyer, who at the time was Célia Costa, who has also signed statements that were given to the Inspector Pereira Cristovão. Leonor's brother, João Cipriano, had previously confessed the crimes a few days before, on the 8 of October.»

Leonor Cipriano’s lawyer confesses to lying to obtain a confession
«Lawyer Aragão Correia, who defends Leonor Cipriano, Joana’s mother, told TSF this Tuesday that he lied to obtain a written confession from João Cipriano, who revealed that he tried to sell the child.»

Leonor Cipriano’s lawyer confesses to having used “creepy” method
«Leonor Cipriano’s lawyer confessed that he obtained a statement from his client’s brother “based on absolutely forbidden methods”. In it, João Cipriano assumed that he had tried to sell his niece Joana. This, at least, is the understanding of the Public Ministry in Portimão, after analysing, and refusing, the request from Marcos Aragão Correia for a revision of the sentence that was applied to Joana’s mother, who has been condemned to 16 years and eight months in prison over qualified homicide and concealment of a cadaver. It is now up to the process’ judge to decide whether or not he accepts the appeal. According to the Public Ministry’s decision, the jurist – in the document in which he requested the revision of the appeal – presented a confession from João Cipriano “that could be used as the basis for a movie scene”. In that written document, Aragão Correia confesses to having invented a story to fool Joana’s uncle: a police source allegedly told him that an inmate intended to murder Leonor’s brother.»

Detectives Hired by the «McCanns want to Frame Gonçalo Amaral
«Método 3, the Spanish detective agency hired by the McCanns, tried to convince Leonor Cipriano's Lawyer to change the course of defense. The agency operational wanted to make of Gonçalo Amaral - the former coordinator of the PJ of Portimão, responsible for the investigation to the disappearance of Madeleine and Joana, the main target, through the intersection of the two cases.»

‘Spanish detectives asked me to arrange for evidence against Gonçalo Amaral’
«The lawyer who cooperated with Método 3 makes surprising revelations - Maddie’s parents divined their daughter’s death - Satanic societies and secret services involved in the Maddie Case - McCann detectives asked me to get proofs against Gonçalo Amaral'»

Joana Cipriano Case
«The court heard a catalogue of horrifying details, including an earlier video taped confession from Joana’s uncle in which he recalled the circumstances of his niece’s murder. This video testimony is now the subject of an appeal from the defence team who claim it should be excluded because the couple exercised their right to remain silent during the trial. In the taped confession, João Cipriano said he and his sister hit Joana who then banged her head against a wall before collapsing, unconscious, onto the floor. João Cipriano claimed that he had wanted to call an ambulance but that his sister prevented him, telling him instead to go to Joana’s stepfather and inform him that she had disappeared.»

Supreme Court of Justice - 'Joana case' ruling - Part I
Supreme Court of Justice - 'Joana case' ruling - Part II
Supreme Court of Justice - 'Joana case' ruling - Part III
Supreme Court of Justice - 'Joana case' ruling - Part IV
« ab) at a certain point in time, due to a motive that has not been exactly established, both arguidos started, conjointly, to successively hit minor CC on the head, prompting her to hit her head on the wall’s corner, being visible that she bled, from her mouth, her nose and her temple, due to the hits against the wall, which also caused the minor’s fall and her death, thus ceasing the arguidos’ activity;

ac) traces of blood from the minor remained on the living room’s walls and floor, on various spots, and also near the entrance;

ad) the arguidos ensured that CC was dead, verifying that she neither breathed nor reacted, and then, not wanting to be held responsible over their daughter’s and niece’s death, decided to prevent said death from becoming known to others;

ae) therefore, they soon decided that they would have to ensure that the existence of any signs in the house of what they had just done could not be verified, that the minor’s body would never be found and that, preferably, everyone would be convinced that the minor had been taken by a third party;

af) therefore, arguida BB remained at home, washing the wall and the floor that had signs of blood from CC, as well as the spot where the minor remained slumped after death, using a mop and its bucket to do so;»


11 comments:

  1. " HC:
    Portanto, esta Filomena Teixeira que vem ficando cada vez mais pequena ao longo dos anos por um sofrimento; desgastada, completamente desgastada, também foi vítima destas circunstâncias.

    Também foi vítima o facto de não ser médica, não ser rica e não ser inglesa.

    Porque se compararmos a diferença do que este País deu em termos de meios à busca do Rui Pedro comparativamente com o que deu à busca da Maddie ficamos envergonhados para o resto da vida. Ficamos! " (excerpto)

    ReplyDelete
  2. What can any body say reading this. When and where will this all end. RIP Joana you are at peace.

    This actually makes me feel so really sad to think that adults can do this to a child. Then muddy the waters.

    Missypuddleduck

    ReplyDelete
  3. Desculpem......... Falei do caso do Rui Pedro devido, também , às diferenças entre Filomena e outra...
    Do empenho dado a um caso ( concordo, claro) e , de não se ter dado o mesmo ao Rui e Família.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 'Blood on the walls, blood on the floor, washing of the walls and floor, child missing'. Just how far do the Joana and Madeleine cases overlap? It is truly horrific.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous # 2 and 4, how right you are! Tears in my eyes. But that doesn't help those children.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Joana. If Cipriano is found to have lied in this trial, do you know whether this will this affect the conviction for perjury against Goncalo Amaral? Will it be dropped or will it remain in place?

    ReplyDelete
  7. @6 The court already stated as a fact that Leonor Cipriano lied, did you read the article above? That is why a certificate was extracted and a case against her was brought to a new trial. Secondly, Gonçalo Amaral wasn't convicted for perjury but for a false statement - it was not a wilful lie as perjury encompasses, i.e, he believed in what was reported to him by his colleagues - and now, since the whole of Leonor's statements are lies, then what did Gonçalo Amaral falsely stated?

    Leonor Cipriano has given about 6 to 8 different and contradicting versions of what happened to Joana Cipriano.

    Leonor Cipriano gave 3 to 4 different versions to different people about the beating.

    Leonor Cipriano gave about 3 to 4 different versions about the PJ officers, in line ups she was never able to identify a single officer.

    Leonor Cipriano lied about her own brother. More importantly about, her own daughter.

    Leonor Cipriano was accused with factual evidence of murdering with the aid her brother, her own daughter Joana. Joana's body was horrifically dismembered, that much was proved.

    Marcos Aragão Correia, Leonor's lawyer who played a pivotal role in the McCann case, admitted to lying in order to obtain a confession from Leonor's brother.

    Leonor's own family don't want her back. What does this say to you?

    This is what a psychological assessment said about Leonor Cipriano:

    «The arguida BB [Leonor Cipriano] manifests socially deviant behaviour at the level of norms, values and responsibilities, emotional instability and difficulties in expressing frustration, while her socialisation was marked by immature, superficial and narcissistic interpersonal relationships, where characteristics of manipulation (to satisfy her own needs) and aggressiveness (of mainly sadistic tonality) are stand out, while in her personality the absence of empathy and the insensibility are salient, leading to the arguida’s despise for other people’s rights, needs and sentiments, directing her aggressiveness towards them, with a weak capacity to feel remorse. She possesses a borderline personality with anti-social/psychopathic, narcissistic and schizoid traits»

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thee explanation for Leonor Cipriano's blue face was that she fell down stairs.
    I wish the police station had hundreds more stairs. Too little blue.
    She is a monster, poor Joana.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thanks very much for your detailed answer, Joana (I'm the poster @6). I appreciate your patience. I did see that the court had already said Cipriano had lied, which is why, I guess, I'm a bit confused as to what this trial is about. Is it to decide her punishment for wrongly accusing the police of attacking her (I assume she is already serving a long sentence for murdering her daughter)? Or is she accused of something else?
    Also, where does this trial leave Goncalo Amaral legally? Will the 'false statement' conviction against him automatically be quashed or does he have to appeal against it?
    I ask, because McCann supporters have made much of this judgement against G Amaral and I imagine he would want this dealt with as soon as possible.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm not surprised Marcos Aragão Correia did a runner to Brazil. Just about everyone connected to this couple is corrupt.

    How strange and utterly sickening that Team McCann and supporters such as Marcos Aragão Correia should use the case of a brutally murdered little girl to promote their abduction story.

    It's not the first time though, is it? It reminds me of the time the McCanns used another murdered child, Mari Luz Cortés, and had her image splashed all over the press without even the basic courtesy of informing her family. When the Cortés family objected, the McCanns employed Clarence Mitchell to launch a vivious attack on them in the media.

    Gerry McCann is heading the Hacked Off campaign because he claims he doesn't want other people to suffer as he and his wife have. What absolute tosh. Team McCann have controlled what comes out in the media from day one, and have even stooped to using the deaths of other children to promote their ludicrous story in the press. Kate and Gerry McCann had no respect whatsoever for Mari's grieving parents and were quite happy to use Mari for their own ends - safe in the knowledge of course, that the Cortés family were poor and did not have expensive lawyers to challenge them and their pompous spokesman.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Are all the recent bogus Madeleine sightings an indication of just how great the need is now to deflect from these revelations of criminal activity by crooks connected in some way or other to the McCanns?

    Have we here 'wheels within wheels' who have worked on behalf of the McCanns, and will the mechanism be revealed?

    Such people are indeed loose canons, who may end up revealing the what, why, when, and wherefore of so much, since they have nothing to lose by what they tell.

    How the McCanns must be wishing they had stayed well clear of them all, as none are to be trusted.

    ReplyDelete