26 October 2013

PJ creates new team to investigate the Maddie case


Investigation. In view of the existence of new evidence, within days it will be decided who will investigate the disappearance of the English child. Portuguese police deny pressures and say, that despite the “close relationship”, they will run a parallel investigation to the Scotland Yard

by Alfredo Teixeira

The Judiciary Police (PJ) reopened the investigation concerning the disappearance of Madeleine McCann and they warrant that this time the parents of the girl who disappeared in Praia da Luz, Algarve, days before her fourth birthday, on May 3, 2007, are not suspects. To the DN the Portuguese police disclosed that there are “new evidence” about what has happened to the child while she slept together with her two twin siblings, in the apartment at the tourist resort. They do not disclose the existence of suspects and only reveal that internally, in the coming days, a team will be created to resume the investigation.

When, last week, on the 17th, the PJ hierarchy met with the Scotland Yard assistant commissioner Mark Rowley and DCI Andy Redwood, who heads the approximately 37 agents working in the British investigation, the decision to request the reopening of the investigation to the Public Ministry (MP) was communicated.

The Portuguese police denies any pressure from the English, stressing that they did not cooperate directly with the Scotland Yard investigation. However, information gathered by the English police, mainly related to the past of some people that were referenced in the case files, would have complemented the analysis by the investigation team in Portugal.

“There were elements gathered that have to do with events before the disappearance of the child and others after. Relating them with those contained in the process already archived have raised a more than reasonable doubt about what happened to the child,” said a source close to the investigation to the DN, adding that a in meeting with Gerry and Kate McCann, and the lawyers of the couple, the PJ asked “absolute silence” about the investigation.

At the headquarters of the London Metropolitan Police who have been working on the case for over a year [sic, for over two years], Scotland Yard said to have found new relevant information, based on the forty thousand documents and clues collected by the police forces from Portugal, UK and eight different companies of private detective and just a few days ago they showed e-fits of a suspect.

A source of the PJ that hasn't, however, worked for this process, does not set aside the divulgation of images of the same kind if appropriate. It acknowledges, however, the important of the work done by the Regional Section of Criminal Investigation and Prevention of the PJ from Porto, led by the coordinator Helena Monteiro. Notwithstanding the formal archival of the investigation, that team was on the field since March last year, searching for leads to follow and in order to fill any eventual gaps in the initial investigations.

That reanalysis task has “helped identify new evidence, which by imposing further investigation, meet the requirements set by article 279º no 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the reopening of the investigation.” said the PJ in a statement. “Similarly to what happens in all the cases of missing children, notwithstanding the formal archival of the investigation concerning her disappearance, and as was always publicly stated, the Judiciary Police continued to be attentive to any and all information likely to enable the understanding of the whereabouts of the minor Madeleine McCann, the circumstances in which her disappearance occurred and the identity of its author(s),” the PJ clarified.

Also yesterday, a note from the Attorney General's Office (PGR) said that the Public Ministry (MP) decided to reopen the investigation. It was on July 21, 2008 that the PGR announced the archival of the process concerning the disappearance of Madeleine McCann and removed the status of arguidos from the parents of the English minor and Robert Murat, with the proviso that they could reopen the process at any time if “new elements of evidence” surfaced, evidence which they now claim to exist as the result of the identification of witnesses who were never heard.

Experience in missing people cases

With the investigation archived since July 2008, it was the National Direction of the PJ who, in March 2011 [sic, 2012], assigned to a team of investigators from the North Directorship the task to re-analyse the whole wide range of information in the process, with the objective of identifying information whose further understanding could be revealed useful and possible. Leading the group of four inspectors was the coordinator Helena Monteiro, with experience in missing people cases, namely the young lady from Lamego, Carina Ferreira, whose body was found after a month of searches at the bottom of a ravine near a motorway. Helena Monteiro has worked, among other areas of investigation, in the fight against violent criminality.

Diário de Notícias, October 25, 2013, paper edition

Refs.

Oporto PJ goes through Madeleine McCann case with a fine toothed comb March 2012

Loose ends of the case only cleared up with the process reopened March 2012

Virtual reconstitution tests witnesses’ version March 2012

Maddie Case: Vanishing Revisited March 2012

5 comments:

  1. The biggest cover up in history before our eyes. The criminals are running the justice system now?!? Justice has been sacrificed to hide a crime. This SUCKS! Sorry Joana but it makes the original PJ patsies and the fate of Madeleine Beth McCann their fault. How the heck was that allowed to happen?

    ReplyDelete
  2. @1 Read the article, just, read it - and notice the mention of churnalism above. Do you really think this journalist had a nice chat with someone from the current PJ investigation? Not at all, this article is just a pastiche, a collage of bits and pieces of other articles, part was taken from the SY press release, the other from the PJ statement, another from a previous article published in the JN 2 years ago. This journo is clueless, he makes factual mistakes with the years. Try to understand, most journalists today don't investigate, they copy paste previously churn press releases from news agencies. Why translate it? Because there's a possibility that this bit «They do not disclose the existence of suspects and only reveal that internally, in the coming days, a team will be created to resume the investigation.» might actually be truthful.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Chess - fabulous game - trick of winning it is to be at least 2 steps ahead of your opponent.

    And there the game analogy ends - as a child is missing.

    By shouting from the PT rooftops that G&K are not suspects - the PJ ensure that the
    Tapas 7 can not avoid having their (often woolly) statements re-examined.

    A Trojan horse so to speak.

    Are the latest developments all a massive whitewash by the ruling classes? Possibly - but I will only truly believe this, if the McCanns leave Britain and start a new life - say in a gated community in New Zealand - just before the twins are old enough to ask the germane questions of their parents themselves.

    Like: 'Mummy, why didn't you come when Madeleine cried'.

    isar

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Joana, I have been following this case from that very first night when the two McCann's gave their initial statement to the media that Madeleine had been taken. Not any sign of true emotion from either of them when you watched it after the first time seeing it. Then watching how the McCann's conducted themselves over the days during which the PJ were doing their investigation. The limelight the McCann's were obtaining went straight to their heads. Jogging, laughing and joking with those around them and then the Pope stunt. In other words they were blaming the PJ for not looking for Madeleine. As it was made apparent they done sweet FA in searching for Madeleine themselves. Which made myself and many doubt the abduction theory and they knew exactly what became of the little one. Notice I am leaving out the word daughter deliberately as I really wonder were they Madeleine's real parents? All they are interested in the initial abduction story backfired due to theirs and their holiday friends statements started to unravel by the PJ. When they were arrested it came as no real surprise. I and many like your good self want to see real justice being done. As you say today's journalists are a shambles. This case has to be resolved who ever is involved. As too many kids have been abused at the hands of what they thought was the ones that was supposed to care for them. Keep up the fight Joana. Madeleine Beth McCann will have her voice heard.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The only thing which made me believe that this whole sad story was brought on by the parents. They never looked like grieving parents from day one. It shocked me then and it shocks me nıw. For me the only proof is the callous behavior of the parents, you don't have to look any further.

    ReplyDelete