1.Everyone shall possess the right to freely express and publicise his thoughts in words, images or by any other means, as well as the right to inform others, inform himself and be informed without hindrance or discrimination 2.Exercise of the said rights shall not be hindered or limited by any type or form of censorship Constitution of the Portuguese Republic, Article 37.º

Freeport records and Maddie on the agenda of Portuguese and British authorities - Update

According to a source close to the Foreign Office and to the Cabinet of Prime Minister Gordon Brown, the British authorities have recently discussed the follow-up of the "affairs" Madeleine McCann and Freeport of Alcochete during  the course of the same meeting.  The information has been confirmed by a source of the Judiciary Police in Portugal , who has also put forward the accusation of "an exchange of good intentions [doing favours for each other]" was considered during this contact between the two countries.

While the "Maddie" case, as it is best known, concerns the disappearance of a three year-old girl and the protection given by the British authorities to her parents, namely by the direct interference of diplomacy and  Gordon Brown's government, the Freeport's case concerns, according to the latest information, money transfers from accounts in the United  Kingdom to Portuguese political personalities and raises questions surrounding the construction of the commercial hypermarket of Alcochete.  


Both cases are embarrassing and Lisbon and London would like, above all else, to avoid the details falling into the public domain: the British would like to avoid the role played by the authorities in the McCann case being known, while the Portuguese no longer want to hear talk about suspicions of corruption which could affect the government and in particular the socialist José Sócrates.

Freeport: a disturbing case.

The announcement by the British authorities, about the existence of offshore English bank accounts belonging to companies directly or indirectly linked to Portugal and the case known as Freeport Alcochete, has just revived a case of alleged corruption which the Portuguese government would like to see forgotten and which the authorities in London, at least publicly, would like to see investigated by a joint team.

According to the British, significant sums of money were sent to a group of lawyers in Lisbon acting as financial intermediaries on behalf of various Portuguese personalities.

Meanwhile, a formal meeting between the Portuguese and British was on the investigators' agenda but, according to a source close to the Public Minister, no agreement seems possible because, officially, the Lisbon authorities are still waiting for the results of a rogatory letter sent to the Home Office in 2005 and which, to this day, has obtained no response.

In any case, the matter has not been buried and allegations are flying in both directions between London and Lisbon accusing the English company, Freeport, of having paid "kickbacks" to personalities in the Portuguese world of politics in order to obtain the necessary permission to build the Freeport Alcochete commercial complex on land belonging to the Nature Reserve of the Tejo estuary, the river that borders Lisbon, where the natural habitat of a great number of endangered species is to be found.

The case goes back to 2005 when, in the middle of the election campaign, accusations of corruption were launched against José Sócrates, then candidate for the Socialist Party (PS) and current Prime Minister. After an investigation, initially directed against the press, responsible for disclosure of the matter, the trial judge ended up sentencing a former PJ inspector, José Torrão, to an 18 months suspended sentence for disclosure of confidential documents. According to the judge, Torrão had committed a crime of violation of official secrets in illegally photocopying internal PJ documents before giving them to the Portuguese press, notably the daily "O Independente."

The former PJ inspector's sentence has, meanwhile, been confirmed by the Lisbon Appeal Court, thus frustrating the Justice Minister who was calling for a retrial in consideration of the crime in question not allowing the use of data from detailed billing and the tracking of mobile phones as evidence.

Now, as was the case with the investigation into Madeleine McCann's disappearance, the British authorities have requested that a joint team be set up in order to follow up the investigation. An idea that does not appeal to the Portuguese legal administration and which has allegedly already led the Attorney General, Pinto Monteiro, to refuse the proposition.

According to a source from the Public Ministry in Lisbon, after the really bad experiences with the British government around the Madeleine McCann case, the Portuguese authorities would like to keep more effective control over the investigation. In Portugal, an investigation had already been entrusted to the Setubal PJ, under the supervision of the Prosecutor for the Montijo Public Ministry, but had not produced the expected results and now the case is in the hands of Cândida Almeida, head of the Central Department of Investigation and Criminal Activity. (DCIAP)

Source: SOS Maddie by Duarte Levy

Update translation by Anne Esse

External/Related Links

BRITISH POLICE want to join forces with Portuguese counterparts to investigate the legality of the construction of one of Europe’s largest factory outlet shopping parks near an environmentally protected nature reserve.

Paulo Rebelo & the Freeport Connection
He was also in charge of a recent investigation about a leak of information from the “Freeport case”, when documents from a corruption investigation were sent to the Press and published the day before the last Parliament elections in Portugal. Those documents allegedly showed a connection between the case and the leader of Socialist Party, José Sócrates, now Prime-Minister. A PJ inspector was accused and later sentenced to eight months in prison (suspended sentence) for making copies of confidential documents and giving it to journalists. 

Business Information
Freeport plc engages in the development and operation of outlet shopping and leisure centers in Europe. Its shopping centers provide a range of retail brands, restaurants, bars, and leisure activities for various ages. The company also organizes various events and entertainment activities at its shopping centers. As of June 24, 2006, it operated 388 retail and leisure units, including 63 in Freeport Kungsbacka, located in Sweden; 85 in Freeport Excalibur, in the Czech Republic; and 240 Freeport Alcochete, in Portugal. Freeport, formerly known as Freeport Leisure plc, was founded in 1994 and is headquartered in Reymond, Monaco.

Freeport Alcochete Official Site


  1. I came to the conclusion that there was political corruption in both countries based on the incomprehensible behaviour of authorities with regard to the McCann case. This is why I have been saying for quite some time that nothing will be resolved unless the political situation changes in both countries. It is nice to know that the Portuguese legal administration has realised that the British authorities can’t be trusted. As one commentator put it Britain has the best of both worlds they are not fully committed to the European Union so they reap some of the benefits of the Union and when it doesn’t suit them they ignore legal procedures such as answering rogatory letters. I don’t see the Freeport case or the Madeleine case being resolved unless other countries put more pressure on England and Portugal to divulge the required information concerning both these cases. Based on how MEPs welcomed the McCanns, I wonder though if other countries are involved in these affairs. The question still remains why would British authorities go to so much trouble to protect the McCann couple? Most likely the answer to this question will reveal even more corruption and perhaps perversity.

  2. And let's not forget that José Sócrates was the minister for the Envyronment when the Freeport center was licensed, he did exactly the opposite of what should be expected from the person invested in that position, instead of fiercely defending and protecting the limits of a nature reserve to the milimiter, he granted permission to alienate some of the area for construction.

  3. Guerra, i stronly agree with you. What allways made me wonder is why so much trouble to protect this not so important couple.IMO they know something that can endanger some powerful people. Freeport case can explain the behaviour of the portuguese side, but the UK side can be a more dark thing , IMO of course.BTW this change of favour, if truth, are very close to blackmail....

  4. Guerra,I fully totally agree with you.The corruption from both governments is leading to the
    the complete trashing of Madeleine"s human rights
    THIS in my eyes is extremely important because as usually children "pay" for the greed and the cruelty of the adults....as she did
    Madeleine,poor little mite,has joined the ranks of the millions of children whose rights are daily overlooked.I am here just referring to a very basic right: the right to LIFE


Powered by Blogger.