1.Everyone shall possess the right to freely express and publicise his thoughts in words, images or by any other means, as well as the right to inform others, inform himself and be informed without hindrance or discrimination 2.Exercise of the said rights shall not be hindered or limited by any type or form of censorship Constitution of the Portuguese Republic, Article 37.º

Where is Madeleine McCann?

When justice is subservient to politics, it never works. Only the separation of powers guarantees democracy.

By André Ventura

The arrest of hacker Julian Assange led to the immediate retaliation by Wikileaks*: the release of thousands of secret documents, including the report of the Judiciary Police regarding the case of the missing English girl in the Algarve.

Any new data? Any special revelations about the investigation? Not really. What stands out is the immediate conclusion that when political actors begin to want to control the course of justice, it rarely works.

Why did the English ambassador worry so much about a criminal investigation? Will he care as much whenever a British suffers or causes a crime in Portugal? Why did the British authorities, namely the Prime Minister, wanted the dismissal of Inspector Gonçalo Amaral at all costs?

But at the same time, we must ask ourselves why did Portugal ceded in sending to an English laboratory, in the midst of all the pressures, the analysis of the DNA that was collected? And why did the information circulate that it would be totally compatible with little Maddie's DNA when in fact the samples were extraordinarily insufficient?

Conclusion: If today some factor is responsible for not knowing where Madeleine McCann is, the political and the PR communications war going on can perfectly assume this role.

Does anyone doubt that, had it not been for the pressure from the British authorities, the McCanns would at least have been charged with the crime of exposure or abandonment? And, on the other hand, does any parent who innocently loses a child refuse to participate in a reconstitution at the request of the police authorities, even at the risk of being detained?

In fact, in the midst of all this backstage war, finding the little English girl or knowing what her fate is seems to have become secondary. This is the lesson to learn: separation of powers has to be taken seriously, even when one has to investigate doctors or engineers from the upper European classes.


*Wikileaks files (external link)

in Correio da Manhã, April 15, 2019

4 comments:

  1. : ) Thanks for the Wikileaks link. Fascinating in this respect - and others.

    Honi soit qui mal y pense, right?

    ReplyDelete
  2. which wikileaks is the Maddie file?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. press ctrl + f search for maddie in the box that will open with the wikileaks page open but the files presented there are available on this blog, namely the PJ report, and the others elsewhere on the net. The most important release by wikileaks concerning this case was in the cable leaks, leaked in 2010, of an internal communication between the then British ambassador in Lisbon and his US counterpart, quote: "THE MADELEINE MCCANN CASE
      -------------------------
      5. (C) Madeleine McCann's disappearance in the south of Portugal in May 2007 has generated international media attention with controversy surrounding the Portuguese-led police investigation and the actions of Madeleine's parents. Without delving into the details of the case, Ellis admitted that the British police had developed the current evidence against the McCann parents, and he stressed that authorities from both countries were working cooperatively. He commented that the media frenzy was to be expected and was acceptable as long as government officials keep their comments behind closed doors." see https://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2010/12/madeleine-case-british-police-indicated.html

      Delete
    2. also https://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2010/12/wikileaks-cables-uk-police-developed.html

      Delete

Powered by Blogger.